黑洞社区

A petition calling for the RICS to withdraw its proposal for a judicial review of home information packs (Hips) has been launched by a group of its members.

The members are incensed at what they see as a lack of consultation by the institution. Margaret Grafham, a partner at SSH chartered surveyors in Liverpool, is one of the members involved in the petition. She said: 鈥淣ever in the history of the RICS has a judicial review been launched, and we were not consulted.

鈥淭he decision was made by a small group of people who did not think it was important to check with the other members. A review like this could cost us half a million pounds.鈥�

The accusation is ironic as the application for judicial review was made on the grounds that the communities department had failed to consult sufficiently before introducing Hips.

The group wants the RICS to withdraw the application for a judicial review so that Hips can be introduced.

The group, made up of individuals from about six surveying firms, launched the petition, RICS Members for the Immediate Launch of HIPs, last Friday.

A spokesperson for the group said it expected to have gained more than 300 signatures by the end of the week. If 1%, or 200 members, of the residential faculty of the RICS sign up, the group will have the power to call an emergency general meeting.

The RICS rejected the accusation that it failed to consult. It said: 鈥淧roper consultation with RICS members was conducted in accordance with RICS鈥� governance structures.鈥�

Following the preliminary findings of the judicial review the government decided to delay the introduction of Hips by two months to 1 August, and then to limit its use to houses with four bedrooms or more.

The RICS said that the main reason for the government鈥檚 decision was the lack of domestic energy assessors to provide a workable scheme from 1 June. It added: 鈥淩ICS did not know about, and was not invited to agree, to the postponement of Hips