How landmark building safety court rulings could clarify the law on liability

Theresa mohammed bw 2018

Landmark rulings on defects, remediation and聽building safety could clarify the law around liability and remedy

Discussion around the scope of the 黑洞社区 Safety Act 2022 (BSA) is showing no sign of abatement, thanks to landmark cases in the First-tier Tribunal, the government鈥檚 response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 report, and what will undoubtedly be a landmark decision from the Supreme Court in an upcoming case. What is clear from recent developments is that the courts are also clearly intent on providing guidance on the application of the Defective Premises Act 1972 (DPA), remediation contribution orders (RCOs), what is meant by a 鈥渄efect鈥 in this context and the ability to throw the net wide to capture associated companies.

 A case that has garnered significant attention was the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in Grey GR Limited Partnership vs Edgewater (Stevenage) Ltd and others (2025). The building in question was on the secretary of state鈥檚 radar and is subject to the first application for a remediation order under the new legislation in October 2022. It is Vista Tower, a 49.5m-high residential building in Stevenage, which was converted from offices to 73 flats. The conversion works were carried out by Edgewater (Stevenage) Ltd, which used combustible materials in the external walls.

This is PREMIUM content, available to subscribers only

You are not currently logged in. Subscribers may LOGIN here.

to access this story

Gated access promo


A subscription will provide access to the latest industry news, expert analysis & comment from industry leaders,  data and research - including our popular annual league tables. You will receive:

  • Print/digital issues delivered to your door/inbox
  • Unlimited access to building.co.uk including our archive
  • Print/digital supplements
  • Newsletters - unlimited access to the stories behind the headlines

now 

 

Get access to premium content