With no more Shards on the horizon, how will Mace keep moving upwards? The firm鈥檚 chief executive explains

Love it or loathe it - and the Shard has sharply divided opinions - most can agree that the latest iconic addition to London鈥檚 skyline is a marvel of modern construction. All the more so when you recall that for Mace, the Shard鈥檚 main contractor, it was not only its first tower, but its first major fixed-price project.

Mace chairman and chief executive Stephen Pycroft smiles when this is pointed out: 鈥淚t was a big coup,鈥 he says. 鈥淧eople were wondering whether Mace was a construction manager, a consultant, a project manager - and we had been doing contracting to a lesser degree - then, all of a sudden, the Shard projected us into the limelight.

鈥淧eople didn鈥檛 think we could do it but it鈥檚 been delivered in style. No longer can people say: 鈥楳ace aren鈥檛 willing to take some risk鈥. Overnight we quashed that comment and lifted Mace into the very top of the premier league of contractors.鈥

Notwithstanding the current problems on ITV鈥檚 new Coronation Street studio, few would dispute that. For a firm that was, not so many years ago, known mainly for construction management, it is now in the running for many of the top London contracting jobs. Against the backdrop of financial crisis and recession, it has enjoyed 75% growth in turnover since 2007 - an average of 17% per year to 2010 - and was the M in CLM, successfully delivering the 拢6.8bn build programme for the Olympic Delivery Authority alongside CH2M Hill and Laing O鈥橰ourke.

But with revenue growth slowing to 9% in 2011, the Shard all but complete, and the Olympic Games transformed from a construction project into a sporting spectacle, there are questions over Mace鈥檚 future trajectory. Exactly how can the firm continue to grow in the current environment? What does the future hold for Pycroft, who steps down as chief executive next year? And what kind of firm is Mace, exactly?

Delivery in many guises

鈥淚 like to think of us as a constructor,鈥 is Pycroft鈥檚 answer to the last question.

This, he says, means being able to deliver for a client 鈥渋n whatever guise he wants鈥. 鈥淲hether in construction management, contracting in any way shape or form, we鈥檝e got the capability, the expertise, and the balance sheet to deliver it,鈥 he says.

But, Pycroft adds, for now being a 鈥渃onstructor鈥 largely means being a main contractor on fixed-price jobs.

The firm鈥檚 results for 2011, exclusively revealed in 黑洞社区 last month, showed that construction revenue comprised 73% of the firm鈥檚 turnover - up 9% from 2010 to 拢681m. In comparison, consultancy work comprised 16% of turnover and international revenues - largely programme management work - 11%.

Pycroft says his main disappointment in recent years is a slower than expected growth in consultancy work - which rose 5% to 拢145m in 2011. He puts this down to the impact of the economic crisis, with clients able to 鈥渢urn off the tap very quickly, whereas they can鈥檛 with construction鈥. Pycroft says he would like to see consultancy revenue rise to around 30% of total turnover and the firm plans to target large programme management contracts, both in the UK and overseas, such as the 拢72m deal to deliver infrastructure works in Qatar that it won in May as part of a joint venture with EC Harris.

Mace will also look at bigger water and waste-to-energy programmes, as well as expanding into defence, with the firm expressing an interest - in partnership with Telereal Trillium - in the Ministry of Defence鈥檚 拢400m contract for a strategic partner to manage the defence estate. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 a big programme of work, and we believe we have the expertise and capabilities to deliver it well,鈥 Pycroft says.

The firm has also expanded into the US, opening a new project and programme management, cost consultancy and facilities management business in New York and Atlanta. Pycroft says the expectation is that the US business will grow in a 鈥渧ery slow manner鈥 - around 10-20% over the next three to four years - with the focus on attracting 鈥済ood quality clients鈥 and ensuring 鈥渙ur reputation is good鈥.

Pycroft

Source: Alamy

Growth - but not quite as fast

Pycroft says the slight tailing off in growth in turnover in 2011 - a rise of 9% to 拢928m compared with 17% the previous year - was a consequence of the downward pressure on margins and ongoing difficult market conditions, with a handful of projects delayed as clients struggled with finance.

But the firm has still enjoyed 75% growth in turnover since 2007 and Pycroft insists it is definitely on track to break through the 拢1bn turnover ceiling this year. It is now targeting a further 40% growth by 2015, with projected revenue of 拢1.3bn.

This, he says, will largely be achieved through the construction side of the business, which will take on a 鈥渂igger and bigger proportion of the company鈥檚 turnover鈥. He says a strong pipeline of commercial and residential work within London will soak up the Shard team.

鈥淥ur pipeline in and around central London is good - it鈥檚 as strong now as it鈥檚 been over the last three or four years, if not stronger. The trouble is outside the M25 where there are very few projects going on and very few major programmes to be won.鈥

Nearly three-quarters of Mace鈥檚 business remains in London and Pycroft says this is unlikely to change in the near future.

鈥淲e don鈥檛 see the necessity to go chasing construction work abroad, with a bigger risk in new markets, especially when we can see a pipeline of work here that can still service our growth expectations in the future.鈥

But he concedes that, in the longer term, the firm will have to look overseas if it is to achieve its ambitions for growth. 鈥淚 think we will have to export our construction expertise abroad into some areas of low-risk construction. I think that鈥檚 the only way - we can鈥檛 survive just within the M25. We鈥檙e going to have to start specifically targeting places where we can start doing construction outside the UK,鈥 he says.

No new Shards

But for now, given the London-focus of its construction business, the firm is unlikely to be building a new Shard (pictured above) any time soon. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think there are going to be many more towers built in London for now and we aren鈥檛 going to rush across to build another one in Moscow or somewhere else and take undue risks,鈥 Pycroft says.

鈥淚t鈥檚 nice to build an iconic building and it鈥檚 nice to change the London skyline but there鈥檚 no need for us to get carried away by our own egos and go chasing around the world trying to deliver another Shard. The aim is to build a nice, solid, sustainable business and if that means we don鈥檛 build another Shard, then I鈥檒l be disappointed - but that鈥檚 life.鈥

The firm is looking to expand into infrastructure work - and Pycroft says the recent completion of the Thames cable car was about 鈥減utting up a flag鈥. 鈥淲e wanted to show that Mace can do big infrastructure projects - not mega ones - but big ones and therefore create a name for ourselves.鈥

Pycroft says he wants infrastructure revenue - currently around 拢80m of turnover and about 12% of Mace鈥檚 construction business - to rise to 拢150m by 2013, but acknowledges that it is a tough market to break into. 鈥淲ill we ever do a Bond Street or a Tottenham Court Road [Crossrail station project]? Not in the next three, four, or five years. Are we ever going to do a M25 road widening? I don鈥檛 think so - but for unique projects where clients want something a bit different, they will come to Mace,鈥 he says.

As a private firm - and in a climate of consolidation - Mace鈥檚 success has inevitably made it the subject of takeover speculation, and there have been approaches, Pycroft says. But he insists the firm is not for sale, adding that its independence gives it an edge. 鈥淭he people involved in the business decide on the direction and if we have to change because of the economic climate than we have to change and we don鈥檛 need to have a bureaucratic debate or discussion about it. It鈥檚 just, 鈥榣et鈥檚 change tack鈥,鈥 he says.

The aim is to build a solid, sustainable business and if that means we don鈥檛 build another Shard, then I鈥檒l be disappointed - but that鈥檚 life

鈥淢ost developers like to deal with people who can make decisions on behalf of the business. The top three contractors we would probably name - Laing O鈥橰ourke, Sir Robert McAlpine and Mace - are all private companies and are all people that top developers can go to and get an answer without having to telex back or email back 12,000 miles to get a decision.鈥

And what of Pycroft鈥檚 own future? The chief executive and chairman is set to hand over the reins to deputy chief executive Mark Reynolds in the first half of 2013 - a firm date has yet to be set - but Pycroft will remain in place as chairman. He admits the final details of how the handover will work have not been worked out, but he says he will have a 鈥渞oving role鈥 and will still be 鈥渉ands on鈥.

鈥淚t will give me more freedom to be involved with clients and get stuck into projects and allow Mark to run the day-to-day business,鈥 he says. 鈥淚鈥檓 still expecting to be fully involved. I鈥檓 not disappearing into the horizon.鈥