...or to put it another way, BAA鈥檚 five-year framework is just a large feather bed, and the military brain behind its new procurement policy wants contractors to fight for their work

Steven Morgan is polite, charming and perfectly friendly 鈥 reassuring qualities in a 6ft 5in former admiral in the US Navy. He is also the man who has, in his first 120 days as BAA鈥檚 capital projects director, blown apart its multibillion-pound framework for major projects.

It would be hard to overstate the impact of that decision, not least to the nine contractors that spent a year winning a place on it in the fond belief that they would get a share of work worth 拢4.8bn over the next five years. Of course, it is good news for all the firms that did not make the framework, and can now put in bids for megaprojects such as Heathrow terminals 2, 3 and 4.

But the wider implications are even more important: BAA was the company that pioneered frameworks in the late nineties, and therefore the whole drive towards collaborative working. Now it has effectively told the rest of the industry that frameworks do not offer the best value for money 鈥 and it is inconceivable that this will not influence other large clients. So why did Morgan do it?

Action

The answer is that he believes in the bracing effects of competition. 鈥淚 want the best,鈥 says the 60 year old in his native Ohio accent. 鈥淚 want the A-team, not the reserves. I want the best talent contractors can offer. I want people to have to work to get my business. To earn my business. And I want them to give me the best work they can for the best value once they have won the contract. I will not be taken for granted.鈥

The blizzard of superlatives, the military metaphors and the tone of command are appropriate from a man with his background. And his attitude to frameworks is equally suggestive of a military approach to discipline. He argues that divvying projects up to keep a pre-selected group of contractors fed over a long period of time is akin to a 鈥渃orporate beauty pageant鈥.

Whatever else he is, at least Morgan is consistent. Before he joined BAA he was commercial director of British Nuclear Fuels, where he was given the job of cutting cost by 拢225m over five years at the Sellafield reprocessing plant. Which he did. 鈥淏AA is like Sellafield five years ago,鈥 he says. 鈥淧eople say, 鈥榶ou鈥檙e doing all the same stuff you did then鈥, and I think that鈥檚 right. I鈥檓 adapting my methods to an airport company. And there is no doubt that this will give me more from my contractors. Competition will raise standards and get better value for money.鈥

To this end, he intends to bundle together many of BAA鈥檚 smaller projects on the grounds that this will save the company money and attract more of the 鈥渂est, bigger international companies out there鈥.

Morgan is quick to dispel any murmurings that his appointment and brief came from anywhere other than BAA鈥檚 top brass, namely through Ferrovial, the Spanish contractor that bought BAA in June 2006. 鈥淔errovial is one of several shareholders of BAA,鈥 he says. 鈥淚t is also a subcontractor. We treat it like any other subcontractor, expecting the highest value for money. I was not recruited or assigned by Ferrovial.鈥

Reaction

Although Morgan may be convinced that his decision was right, he is fully aware that it has not gone down well with much of the industry. Presented with this point, he takes a deep breath and leans forward to respond: 鈥淚 had meetings with each of the directors of the companies on the framework, and they certainly see this as a change in the strategy as they understood it 鈥 and it is,鈥 he says deliberately. 鈥淏ut none of them are afraid of a bit of competition. And I think they can all see the opportunities because now they have the option to bid for any part of the BAA construction programme they like; they are not hemmed in.鈥

As for the fear among industry figures that that this sort of behaviour could kill collaborative working, Morgan is not having a bit of it. 鈥淗aving guaranteed work over a five or 10 year period is a luxury that most companies would aspire to,鈥 he says. 鈥淣ow, I don鈥檛 want to create an adversarial relationship with my supply chain. I don鈥檛 want to revert back to what was typical 20 years ago where you had a tough stance with contractors, you didn鈥檛 really care what they wanted or whether they made any money. But BAA has to earn customers every day and I would expect any good company to earn its business. For that reason I don鈥檛 think frameworks should be used for major capital construction projects looking a decade into the future. You鈥檝e got to know what the price is going to be. I don鈥檛 think you turn your wallet over and hope that your contractor will be nice to you.鈥

Benefits

He goes on to point out that his decision will spread BAA鈥檚 money among more suppliers. 鈥淲e are one of the few clients spending more money on construction this year and next,鈥 he says; 拢70m a month to be precise, rising to 拢120m later in the year. 鈥淣ow companies who were not on the original framework can get in on that, and there will be a lot to be won, and companies that were on the framework can bid for whatever they want. Beforehand they were only allowed to go for certain jobs. The changes have opened up huge opportunities for the construction industry.鈥

In fact, so keen is Morgan to foster the spirit of free enterprise that he wants to encourage bids from firms from outside the construction industry entirely. 鈥淚鈥檓 looking for companies that can bring together a number of subcontractors and deliver on major capital programmes,鈥 he says. 鈥淲e would therefore be interested not just in construction companies but in firms who support oil and gas, the Ministry of Defence, the ones in the business of making infrastructure. And the ones in the nuclear industry. I want to bring in a few more of these sorts of firms from outside to bid for jobs.鈥

Winning

Having painted a warts-and-all picture of what the industry is up agains, Morgan does take the time to give a few hints on what ts potential members could do to impress him. 鈥淚 want ideas,鈥 he says. 鈥淭hey don鈥檛 even have to be formal proposals but I want to know how you can save us money, how you can improve our business. For example, someone could say, 鈥楬ey, have you thought about using full automation and robots to manage all your baggage systems?鈥 Or, 鈥楬ave you thought about using wind turbines in the design of your terminals.鈥 And these are all ideas people can offer even before we start running competitions 鈥 our doors are always open.鈥

And to make life easier for new and smaller firms wanting to be considered for BAA鈥檚 huge volume of work, Morgan has plans to introduce a supply chain ombudsman to 鈥渋dentifying good marriages鈥, a system he refers to as a 鈥渃learing council鈥. 鈥淚f companies wanted to link up with someone more senior in the supply chain, and come to us with a really good idea, we might be able to introduce that company to firms that are already part of the supply chain through this ombudsman. That would be a good, safe way in.鈥

Separation

Another distinctive feature of BAA鈥檚 old approach to projects was its involvement in the running of the jobs. During the epic Heathrow Terminal 5 project it functioned more as a part of the project team than a traditional client. Not any longer. For Morgan, this system lacked rigour.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 want to be a construction company,鈥 he says. 鈥淚 am the customer. My job is to define exactly what I want from the start of the process to avoid expensive changes. My job is to select a contractor to deliver that and pass the message down the supply chain. That鈥檚 what the client should be focused on, not getting distracted by being overly involved on site. That鈥檚 not the client鈥檚 job. I don鈥檛 want my company to be populated by project managers 鈥 that is what my supply chain should do. In fact, I don鈥檛 even want to use that job title for my staff.鈥

This is a point that Morgan clearly feels strongly about. As a military man, he likes clear chains of command and well delineated authority. So, the words 鈥減artnering鈥 and 鈥渁lliance鈥 trouble him in relation to a client鈥揷ontractor relationship because they can blur the lines of who is responsible for what, and lead to mistakes being made. 鈥淲hen you鈥檙e in some kind of partnership there can be chaos as it鈥檚 not always clear what鈥檚 being done,鈥 he says. 鈥淪eparation makes things clearer, I am doing that because I want to discipline the way we do business.鈥

Morgan in a minute

What do you miss most about the US?
Butterfingers (a type of chocolate candy bar) and American football.

What do you never leave the house without?
My car keys and my BlackBerry.

What watch do you wear?
A Casio Protec with altimeter, barometer and stopwatch.

What鈥檚 on your iPod?
I don鈥檛 have one; I have a Zoone which is the Microsoft competitor. On that I have classical guitar, new age and American Indian music.

If you won the National Lottery tomorrow what would you buy?
A sail boat.

Which five guests would you invite to your fantasy dinner party?
The Queen, Carla Bruni, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Barack Obama and Bill Gates.

The new BAA construction programme system

鈥淐ompetition is one of the best ways of achieving value for money,鈥 says Morgan. 鈥淧reviously we didn鈥檛 consider a price, we didn鈥檛 consider a technical approach, we didn鈥檛 consider risk allocation. We鈥檙e not going to throw the framework arrangements out, but now it鈥檒l just be used for what it was intended to be 鈥 for the projects under 拢10m. For anything between 拢10m and 拢25m we will have a limited competition among two, three or four framework contractors. Projects worth more than 拢25m will be opened up entirely to competition through the EU鈥檚 Most Economically Advantageous Tender model.鈥

In reality fewer projects will fall into the sub-拢10m and 拢10-25m categories as Morgan鈥檚 strategy involves bundling these smaller schemes. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 want lots of small six-month schemes,鈥 he says.

Downloads