黑洞社区

There鈥檚 no getting away from it. This year鈥檚 results season for the major quoted contractors was overshadowed by the gaping Carillion-shaped hole that appeared after its collapse three months ago.

It was immediately apparent that many would be forced to book losses as a result. Within hours of the news it had gone bust, Balfour Beatty and Galliford Try, the firm鈥檚 partners in a joint venture to build a bypass around Aberdeen, said they were on the hook for up to 拢80m between them on the project. Others to put out stock exchange announcements that January day included M&E specialist T Clarke and tool rental firm Speedy Hire.

More than 50 announcements have since been made relating to the collapse, ranging from Kier鈥檚 news that it was taking on former Carillion staff through to piling specialist Van Elle鈥檚 revelation that it was facing a 拢1.6m hit.

There wasn鈥檛 much gloating that a rival had fallen, paving the way for others to step in. The feeling was that 15 January, the date that Carillion went down, was a bad day for the construction industry.

The revelations that came out in the parliamentary inquiry into the disaster made for great headlines and titillating reading 鈥� one of the most eyebrow-raising was that the business recovery plan Carillion presented to the government as a part of a proposed rescue package included the premise that it would recover 拢262m in claims on nine jobs. Not only that, it was going to get the money back by the end of 2020. It was extraordinary stuff, and many must have looked on in horror, shaking their head and thinking: not all contractors are run this way. 

In the middle of all of this, results season began.

A trying year

First off the blocks, on Valentine鈥檚 Day, was Galliford Try. For its construction business, the interim results were a bit of a massacre. The Aberdeen road was the main culprit, with the firm racking up a 拢25m hit on the job and announcing it planned to raise 拢150m in a rights issue to cover the scheme鈥檚 ballooning costs once and for all. It had already been forced to announce provisions on the scheme last year.

鈥淸Balfour] has complete control of its balance sheet and is making decisions on its businesses based upon simple economics鈥�

Kevin Cammack, Cenkos

The rights issue has been completed, raising 拢158m, but the road is still unfinished. Originally meant to be wrapped up last autumn, the date was first put back to late spring, before Balfour Beatty let the cat out of the bag when, in its results, it said the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route would not be finished until this summer 鈥� which forced client Transport Scotland to announce the road would not in fact be ready until the autumn.

The job meant Galliford Try鈥檚 construction arm slipped 拢18m into the red 鈥� but there was underlying progress. The division posted a pre-exceptionals profit of 拢7.2m on revenue up 11% to 拢824m. Operating margin rose to 0.9% from 0.4% last time. Galliford Try has previously said it wants its construction business to be hitting margins of 2% by 2021. Still, the Aberdeen road dragged operating margins in the construction arm into negative territory at -2.2%. By way of comparison, the company鈥檚 Linden Homes housebuilding business edged margins up to 18.5%.

Solid performers

Morgan Sindall 鈥� a star performer last year following its own woe in Scotland courtesy of problem Ministry of Defence jobs at Faslane that came with its deal to buy back part of Amec in 2007 鈥� kept up the good work in its latest results.

It turned in a bumper set of figures, as it saw 2017 pre-tax profit climb by nearly half, and margins at its construction and infrastructure business more than double. 

The firm said revenue was up 9% to 拢2.8bn, with the group seeing its overall operating margin climb from 1.9% to 2.5%. Pre-tax profit was up 48% to 拢64.9m. Construction and infrastructure is the largest part of the business and here operating margins jumped from 0.7% to 1.5%, helped by an improved performance at its construction division.

Morgan Sindall says 鈥渢here will be continued margin progression in construction and infrastructure鈥�, adding that its 2018 results will beat expectations. Cenkos analyst Kevin Cammack hails the results as 鈥渁nother excellent trading performance鈥� and adds 鈥渋ts momentum is not yet a thing of the past鈥�.

Ground engineering specialist Keller hit a record 拢2bn turnover last year and saw pre-tax profit jump 拢37m to more than 拢110m. At the end of last month, it completed the $90m (拢64m) takeover of New Jersey-based geotechnical specialist Moretrench. North America is Keller鈥檚 biggest market by far, but the picture from the region was mixed: income was up 2% to 拢969m, but underlying operating profit fell 14% to 拢78.7m thanks to the impact of hurricanes Harvey and Irma and the hit-and-miss performances of some of its US businesses.

Galliford Try and Balfour Beatty must be casting envious glances at Costain, which has waved goodbye to a problem contract with a similar profile to Aberdeen road 鈥� a PFI job bid under a lump sum and one that dogged the firm for years.

鈥滷or now, let鈥檚 just be content that Interserve is not the next Carillion鈥�

Kevin Cammack, Cenkos

Costain won the 拢400m contract to design and build 43 facilities across 27 sites as part of Greater Manchester Waste Authority鈥檚 拢3.8bn waste management project a decade ago but suffered a series of losses after being mired in snagging work. But last August, the firm said it had agreed a deal with operator Viridor Laing to finish up work the following month.

It said it had now left the job completely and that provisions on the deal had already been accounted for.

The firm posted a solid set of annual results, with revenue up 4% to 拢1.7bn while pre-tax profit was up 25% to 拢38.9m. But margins at its largest division, infrastructure 鈥� which includes its road, rail and nuclear work and accounts for 80% of its turnover 鈥� slipped from 4.4% to 3.8% with the firm blaming high bid costs and the timing of returns on contracts. Costain said it expects margins to return to within its 4%-5% target range this year.

The biggies

Now Carillion has gone, Balfour Beatty remains in a league of its own as the country鈥檚 biggest builder. Its 2017 income of 拢8.3bn is way ahead of the next two highest-scoring players, Interserve 鈥� which is yet to report but in 2016 had a turnover of 拢3.2bn 鈥� and Laing O鈥橰ourke, which posted turnover of 拢3.2bn, although this figure is somewhat out of date, given it is for the 12 months to March 2017. 

A few years ago, Carillion made a bid for Balfour Beatty. Chief executive Leo Quinn was brought in to right the Balfour Beatty ship 鈥� which had been listing horribly 鈥� and make sure its would-be new owner was told where to go.

Three years ago Balfour nosedived to a 拢304m pre-tax loss, thanks to a host of problem UK jobs, but this year saw pre-tax profit jump from 拢10m to 拢117m. That makes the contractor this year鈥檚 undoubted star performer 鈥� so, what did Quinn do that his counterparts at Carillion didn鈥檛?

Quinn calls the 拢304m loss in 2015 the firm鈥檚 鈥渄arkest hour鈥� and says: 鈥淲e had to get stuck in [making changes] and there鈥檚 no doubt the things we鈥檝e done have made Balfour Beatty a stronger, safer company.鈥� Of the simultaneous troubles at Carillion and their very different outcome, he says: 鈥淚 knew it would take three or four years [for Carillion] to get out of it but I think they made important decisions too late.鈥� 

Quinn doesn鈥檛 pull any punches either on the causes of Balfour Beatty鈥檚 own difficulties. At one stage the firm was juggling 89 problem contracts, of which just a handful 鈥� including inevitably the Aberdeen bypass 鈥� remain. He says: 鈥淭he management we had that got us into the mess has moved and we have more energy and better discipline. Culturally, we are in a very different place.鈥�

The firm has pulled out of the Middle East 鈥� 鈥渁 real drain on the company鈥檚 resources鈥�, Quinn adds 鈥� and says it is sticking to its core US and UK markets. In the UK it has posted a 拢21m profit following a 拢65m loss in 2016, and Quinn has told the division鈥檚 bosses he is confident enough to see the firm posting margins of 2%-3% in the second half of 2018.

Last month the firm splashed out close to 拢10m on earthworks plant to make it more capable of in-house delivery on major infrastructure works such as HS2. It鈥檚 a move that has gone down well with Cenkos鈥� Cammack, who says: 鈥淔or me [it鈥檚] a sure sign the group now has complete control of its balance sheet and is making decisions on its businesses based upon simple economics.鈥�

Wait and see

Quinn says he won鈥檛 be going anywhere near Carillion鈥檚 problem hospital jobs in Liverpool and the West Midlands. Kier, by contrast, said for a time that it was mulling these over. But it has now abandoned the idea, and given how much it has recently spent on getting out of two problem areas 鈥� the Caribbean and Hong Kong 鈥� that might not be such a bad thing.

Margins at Kier鈥檚 construction business in the first half took a hit 鈥� falling from 2% to 1.8% 鈥� as the firm said the final costs of closure in those regions would be close to 拢100m. It had initially said in July 2016, when it made the decision, that the bill for shutting its Caribbean arm would be just 拢18m.

Kier still hasn鈥檛 reached agreement over a final account and claims on a 拢600m toll bridge it helped build over the River Mersey at Widnes.

But the firm鈥檚 McNicholas Construction acquisition, bought last summer, has bedded in. Operating margins here rose to 4.9% and the firm says it is on track for double-digit profit growth this year. Kier releases its full-year results on 20 September.

The one major firm yet to report is, of course, Interserve. Its 2017 results were due out in the last week of March but these got delayed as chief executive Debbie White negotiated a rescue deal with the banks. The firm said last autumn the cost of pulling out of the energy-from-waste market would be close to 拢200m, but has added nothing more to this figure since.

Interserve still requires major surgery and is expected to see debt somewhere around 拢600m in the first half of next year. But White seems to be doing something about it all under the Fit for Growth restructuring initiative and, crucially, it does have businesses it can sell 鈥� unlike Carillion 鈥� such as equipment services arm RMD Kwikform and fit-out firm Paragon.

The results will be out in the last week of April, but as Cammack says: 鈥淔or now, let鈥檚 just be content that Interserve is not the next Carillion.鈥�