Plans for 52-storey tower pulled as concerns raised over single staircase design
Ballymore has pulled an application for a 52-storey tower block in Tower Hamlets at the last minute after the fire brigade raised concerns about the lack of a second means of escape from the building.
The Anglo-Irish developer confirmed it had withdrawn the for the Cuba Street scheme, designed by architects Morris + Company with Rolfe Judd as planning consultant, after Tower Hamlets were sent comments on its application yesterday, just before it was due to go to committee.
Tower Hamlets cancelled the expected planning and development committee meeting in light of Ballymore鈥檚 decision to withdraw the scheme.
Prior to receiving the response from the London Fire Brigade, officers at Tower Hamlets had recommended councillors approve the scheme, which was proposed to have just a single flight of stairs by which residents could evacuate in an emergency.
Current regulations allow residential tower blocks to be built with just a single means of escape, where the design allows a 鈥渟tay-put鈥� strategy in the event of a fire, with the block resisting spread of fire between apartments.
However, many other countries require at least two fire escapes for tall buildings, and critics say such designs ignore the lessons from the Grenfell Tower fire, where 鈥渟tay put鈥� advice led residents to remain in the burning building and await rescue.
Fire engineer Arnold Tarling told the Guardian such designs were 鈥渦tter madness鈥�.
An officers鈥� report to the committee on the scheme said Ballymore had this month submitted a Fire Strategy Report to accompany the application, which consisted of a 鈥渉igh-level review of fire safety requirements for the proposed development based on relevant British Standards and [which] addresses means of escape, fire safety systems, internal fire spread, external fire spread and access and facilities for the fire service.鈥�
It added that all the designs were 鈥渃onsidered to be acceptable鈥�. However, at the point the report was written, no response to the application had been received from the London Fire Brigade.
An LFB spokesperson yesterday told the Guardian the design 鈥渄oes not provide suitable and convenient means of escape and associated evacuation strategy for all building users鈥�.
鈥淚n buildings with a single escape route, we would expect the developer to have their own fire engineers provide a full review to show the resilience in the event of a fire and this does not appear to have been carried out.鈥�
A Tower Hamlets Council spokesperson said yesterday: 鈥淐omments from the London Fire Brigade were received today, which raise a number of issues that will need to be addressed.
鈥淭he applicant has asked for more time to respond and therefore the item was not considered at last night鈥檚 meeting, and will only be brought to committee once these issues are resolved.鈥�
A Ballymore spokesperson said: 鈥淎s part of the planning application for our Cuba Street development, Ballymore received comments from the London Fire Brigade on the day it was going to committee, requesting clarification around aspects of the application.
鈥淲e are more than happy to provide that clarification and will continue to work closely with the LFB and local authority towards presenting the scheme for planning approval in due course.
鈥淟ike all Ballymore developments, the Cuba Street scheme will be built in full accordance with approved and emerging guidance and British Standards.鈥�
1 Readers' comment