黑洞社区

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors has refused a request by a group of 40 former and current employees to launch an investigation into how the organisation selected staff to be furloughed during the pandemic.

The group has demanded an independent inquiry with the 鈥渟ame weight鈥� as last month鈥檚 Levitt report, which led to a series of high-profile resignations at the troubled body.

All members of the group were furloughed in April 2020 during the early part of the first lockdown, with all but a handful being made redundant in November of that year.

In a statement to the RICS, the 鈥楻ICS Furloughed or Redundant Personnel Taskforce鈥� said that many of its members felt the way they had been treated was 鈥渂eyond acceptable鈥�.

A spokesperson for the group alleged that staff were chosen to be furloughed because the RICS had considered them too supportive of the institution鈥檚 membership over the interests of the senior team led by Sean Tompkins, who resigned last month.

The letter demanded an audit looking into the rationale behind the RICS鈥� choice of individuals to be furloughed, and why certain questions during the individual鈥檚 consultation period had not been answered.

It also asked for the reopening of all grievances and complaints dealt with by Tompkins, former chief operating officer Violetta Parylo, chief people officer Marina Kilcline and HR chief Kay Meredith.

It adds that any inquiry should be undertaken by an independent HR professional, as the group does not believe that the RICS鈥� in-house HR team will look at the complaint 鈥渋n an ethical manner鈥�.

In a response to the letter, the RICS said there was 鈥渘o basis鈥� for undertaking a review and 鈥渢herefore consider this matter closed鈥�.

The response argued that the furloughing of staff and later redundancies were a 鈥渄irect response to the unprecedented circumstances which RICS found itself in as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic鈥�.

It added that while the loss of staff was 鈥渞egrettable鈥�, nothing in the Levitt report had suggested improper conduct.

The spokesperson for the group told 黑洞社区 that the RICS was 鈥渉iding behind鈥� the independent review.

The RICS鈥� response to the group, sent on 4 October, came in the wake of apologies issued by the institution to four non-executive directors who were ousted from the body鈥檚 governing council in November 2019.

The Levitt report found that the non-execs, who had raised concerns about the suppression of a damning financial report into the RICS鈥� treasury management, were wrongfully dismissed amid a 鈥減ower struggle鈥� at the top of the institution.

The non-execs later released a statement criticising the apology, saying they found it 鈥渄ifficult to accept as a statement of genuine contrition鈥� because it appeared on the RICS鈥� website alongside messages of thanks from acting governing council chair Nick Maclean to Tompkins and former president Kathleen Fontana, who also resigned last month following the publication of Levitt鈥檚 report.

Last week 黑洞社区 delivered an open letter to the RICS containing excerpts from more than 25,000 words sent to this magazine by members on changes they would like to see at the institution.

It comes as the RICS hunts for an external reviewer to carry out a review into the purpose, governance and strategy of the organisation, one of the recommendations in Levitt鈥檚 report.

Earlier this month, 黑洞社区 revealed that the government had recommended four individuals believed to be retired civil servants to conduct the review, which is set to start by the end of next month.