黑洞社区

The professional institute for surveyors has proposed new guidance designed to vastly reduce the scope of buildings subject to EWS1 fire safety assessments for cladding.

The safety assessments, introduced by the RICS in 2019 in a bid to provide reassurance to lenders and insurers of high-rise blocks, have contributed to a major blockage in the housing market after a government rule change meant insurers and lenders started requiring them on flat blocks regardless of height.

The proposals from the RICS follow an agreement between the body and housing secretary Robert Jenrick last November which the government said would free up to 431,000 leaseholders from the requirement to undertake the EWS1 assessment.

Jenrick said at the time that the new measures would provide 鈥渃ertainty鈥� for homeowners who have 鈥渇elt stuck in limbo鈥� during the crisis.

The proposals, which were issued for consultation last Friday, make clear that buildings of more than six storeys should not need the assessment unless they either have a cladding system or have vertically stacked balconies constructed from flammable material.

黑洞社区s of five or six storeys should not require the form unless they have a cladding system covering more than a quarter of the surface of the building, or if they have any cladding at all comprised of Grenfell-style ACM/MCM (Aluminium/Metal Composite Material) panels, or vertically stacked flammable balconies.

In addition, buildings of four or fewer storeys should only need to receive an EWS1 sign-off if there are ACM/MCM panels on the building.

The confusion over the EWS1 safety assessment system has been credited with trapping thousands of homeowners in unsellable properties as they have been unable to get experts to undertake the assessments.

This situation has been exacerbated by a dire shortage in the number of fire safety professionals qualified to sign the forms 鈥� just 291 according to the housing ministry.

The RICS said the new guidance, when brought in, should help by setting out a consistent position for valuers carrying out mortgage valuations, on when EWS1 forms should be requested for buildings with cladding, to avoid unnecessary delays.

Ben Elder, head of valuation standards at the RICS, said the introduction of the EWS1 assessment has been affected by changing government guidance and insurance industry practice, and was 鈥渘ever intended to hold up the market, indeed without it, no one would be moving鈥�.

He added: 鈥淭here will clearly still be many cases where an EWS1 form is necessary but the guidance and insight resulting from this consultation will enable us to continue to work with stakeholders, including the government, to find solutions to help speed up the process for remediating these buildings.鈥�

The RICS said the guidance note was subject to final approval by the institute鈥檚 independent standards and regulation board, chaired by Dame Janet Paraskeva. She urged as many people as possible to respond to the consultation and said: 鈥淧ublic confidence in the safety of buildings with external cladding systems is at an all-time low.

鈥淭he purpose of the guidance is to create consistency, and to support best practice, in order to ensure that properties affected are properly identified and those unaffected by unsafe cladding are not unnecessarily impacted.鈥�

The news came as the Sunday Times reported that the government has included a gagging clause on applications to its 拢1bn cladding remediation fund, preventing those applying for it from talking to the press without government approval.