黑洞社区

The RIBA has become the first big built environment professional body to criticise the newly published 黑洞社区 Safety Bill, saying it does not do enough to address the 鈥渇ractured鈥� nature of the construction industry.

Its president Alan Jones said he still had worries following the unveiling of the long-awaited legislation, which is intended to ensure a disaster like the Grenfell Tower fire is never repeated.

Jones said: 鈥淲e remain concerned that the proposed system does not fully address the fractured nature of current construction, procurement and contractual arrangements, which lack continuity of expertise.鈥�

The lack of clearly defined roles responsible for building safety has been a major theme emerging from the ongoing Grenfell Inquiry, which has seen witnesses from firms involved in the tower鈥檚 ill-fated refurbishment engage in what lead counsel Richard Millett QC has called a 鈥渕erry-go-round of buck passing鈥�.

The bill was presented to the Commons without debate on Monday afternoon and contains measures to introduce a new regulator for buildings over 18m, a new homes ombudsman and a tougher regulatory framework for construction products.

It will also see enhanced power given to the Architects Registration Board (Arb), which will monitor architects鈥� professional development and be able to strike off anyone who fails to meet the required standard of competence.

Other new powers handed to Arb include publicly listing disciplinary orders against an architect on the register and introducing new fees for certain services.

Jones said RIBA would continue to work closely with the Arb to improve architectural education and professional development to ensure that new competency measures enhance rather than burden the profession.

He added: 鈥淭hese practical details need urgent attention, in direct consultation with architects, and other experts within the sector 鈥� as we unite through a shared ambition to instil confidence and protect public safety.鈥�

Meanwhile, the bill could leave the industry scrambling to defend itself from an 鈥渦nprecedented avalanche of claims鈥� just when it should be concentrating on making buildings safe, a partner at housing architect PRP has warned.

Andrew Mellor, a technical advisor to MHCLG, said the bill would put pressure on the industry as it unleashed a barrage of legal claims for shoddy work dating back 15 years.

The biggest change in the bill since it was published in draft form was the extension of the period of time leaseholders can lodge claims for defective work, something that was welcomed by some but criticised as insufficient by many leaseholder groups since it comes without additional financial support.

There are thought to be about 700,000 people trapped in dangerous flats and three million in homes they cannot sell unless they pay for 鈥渄efects鈥� to be made safe.

Mellor, a specialist in defect analysis, facade replacement, fire safety and regulatory compliance, said: 鈥淭he leaseholder ability to claim announcement has worried lawyers as they see that there will be an unprecedent avalanche of claims, previous decisions may be overturned and precedent case law will quickly change. Some leaseholder groups are already bringing class actions under the Defective Premises Act and some building owners are struggling to resource the required responses.

鈥淭he new announcement will undoubtedly put greater pressure on the industry to defend claims when their efforts should, certainly initially, be focused on making buildings safe.鈥�

The Construction Leadership Council called on all firms in the industry to get clued up on the changes so they can start implementing them at all stages of projects on all types of buildings.

Construction Products Association chief executive Peter Caplehorn, who also co-chairs the CLC鈥檚 building safety workstream, said the bill was a 鈥渞eally significant moment鈥� for the UK construction industry.

鈥淎long with a range of initiatives already underway which are helping to drive culture change across the industry, the legislation will provide the much-needed legal framework for reform,鈥� he added.