Carillion鈥檚 拢1.6bn Birmingham Energy Savers project is one of 49 local authority schemes being revised or on hold
Carillion鈥檚 拢1.6bn Birmingham Energy Savers project is among 49 local authority energy efficiency schemes being revised, scrapped, or put on hold, following government plans to slash the Energy Companies Obligation.
The figures come just a week after the government confirmed the details of its plans, first announced in December, to cut the Energy Companies Obligation (ECO), which subsidises energy efficiency retrofit projects.
According to the government鈥檚 own calculations, its cuts will cost 14,000 jobs and slash 拢900m from the programme.
Now figures from the Labour Party collected through Freedom of Information requests to 146 local authorities show that 49 schemes have already been stopped or put on hold even though the plans are still out to consultation.
Instead of making energy companies honour their obligations, Cameron has let them off the hook
Caroline Flint, MP
The figures show that over 54,000 homes would have been treated through ECO under the 49 schemes, but this is now likely to fall.
Major schemes affected include Carillion鈥檚 拢1.6bn Birmingham Energy Savers job, which is being revised; Newcastle council鈥檚 scheme, being delivered by a British Gas-led consortium, including Wates, has some ECO elements under review; and Southampton鈥檚 拢1bn scheme, being delivered by Mitie, is also now on hold.
Local authorities have been a major player in delivering ECO and Green Deal schemes in concentrated local programmes, and are acknowledged by experts and politicians as critical to driving the success of the Green Deal and ECO.
Labour鈥檚 shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint, who uncovered the figures, said: 鈥淭he best way to cut people鈥檚 energy bills is to invest in insulation and save the energy that escapes through our windows, walls and rooftops.
鈥淏ut instead of making the energy companies honour their obligations, David Cameron has let them off the hook. Worst of all, even though the energy companies now have to help fewer households, they鈥檝e still been allowed to hike up people鈥檚 bills.鈥�
Chancellor missing out on tax revenues from solid wall insulation
The government failed to consider the benefits of the tax receipts it receives from the solid wall insulation industry before slashing one of its main retrofit programmes, research by the Institute of Public Policy Research has found.
Earlier this month the government announced plans to cut its support for solid wall insulation, which is primarily delivered through the Energy Companies Obligation.
But this week a report by the IPPR said that investing in solid wall insulation would create 鈥渟ubstantial levels of revenue for the exchequer鈥�.
It said the government had not accounted for the money it would get back from keeping subsidies in place through VAT, corporation tax, income tax, nor the savings on unemployment costs and on the NHS due to the improved health of residents that have solid wall insulation installed in their homes.
The report warned: 鈥淚f the government cuts its ambition on solid wall insulation by 75% , as proposed, this would lead to an equivalent drop in the exchequer receipts it receives from its solid wall insulation investments.鈥�
1 Readers' comment