黑洞社区

A report by MPs has slammed the government for axing its zero carbon buildings policy and called for it to be reinstated.

Shortly after winning the general election last summer the Conservatives scrapped both the target for all new homes and all other buildings to be zero carbon by 2016 and 2019 respectively.

An investigation by MPs on the Environmental Audit Committee said the decision by the Treasury was one of many it made on environmental matters 鈥渁t short notice with little or no consultation with relevant businesses and industries.鈥�

The MPs鈥� report found the Treasury had 鈥渞idden roughshod鈥� over other departments鈥� objectives to change and cancel several long-established environmental policies.

It noted the decision to axe the zero carbon homes policy caused 鈥渟hock鈥� and 鈥渦proar鈥� in the construction industry, including among housebuilders, who had been working towards implementing the policy for over a decade.

The committee added there is a risk that costs to the economy and householders will increase in the long-term due to the 鈥渓ast minute decision鈥� as new homes will need to be retrofitted to contribute towards meeting the UK鈥檚 2050 carbon targets, and recommended that the government reinstate the policy.

The report argued that the technical and political frameworks the Treasury uses to back up its decisions tend to favour short-term priorities over long-term sustainability.

The committee added that 鈥渃omparatively expensive, glamorous鈥� low carbon technologies, such as off-shore wind power and nuclear energy, received more attention than energy efficiency measures, which it says 鈥渕ight represent better value for money.鈥�

The committee鈥檚 chair, Mary Creagh MP, said: 鈥淭he Treasury is highly influential and uniquely placed to ensure the whole of Government works to promote sustainability. But we have seen considerable evidence that it fails to do this.

鈥淭he Treasury tends not to take full account of the long term environmental costs and benefits of decisions which would reduce costs for taxpayers and consumers in the long run.鈥�

Responding to the report, UKGBC campaign and policy director John Alker said: 鈥淸Scrapping zero carbon homes] showed not only an irresponsible disregard for the steps we need to take to tackle climate change, but also overlooked the years of investment and preparation made by thousands of companies across the construction supply chain.

鈥淭his volatility in the policy landscape is highly damaging to industry, jobs and investor confidence.鈥�