黑洞社区

But we need your advice. We want to know what you think an industry-wide code of practice should include. Read on to find out how it could work, who has already pledged their support and how you can sign up.

So how might this code of conduct take shape?

The immediate challenge in the Rebuilding Trust campaign is to draft a code capable of restoring clients鈥� confidence in the integrity of the tendering process.

For the code to have effect, clients鈥� tendering criteria will need to favour bids from signatories to the code. They, in turn, will need to demonstrate compliance with the code and its anti-corruption or ethical policies.

If the industry is serious about promoting an ethical construction industry, adopting a voluntary code to combat anti-competitive activity would be a highly visible way of demonstrating its commitment.

The code could incorporate the following commitments by signatories:

鈥� To self-certify that the tenderer has not collaborated with other bidders

鈥� To provide the tenderer鈥檚 anti-corruption or ethics policy when submitting tender documents

鈥� To sign documentation that includes warranties and undertakings by the tenderer that it has not engaged in anti-competitive practices

鈥� To accept contract terms that provide for termination and compensation in the event of the breach of such warranties and undertakings

鈥� To ensure that staff (at all levels) are aware of the company鈥檚 anti-corruption or ethics policy and are trained to recognise anti-competitive practices.

Since the key objective of a voluntary code would be to establish a culture of trust and transparency by tenderers, a fundamental principle of the code should be the signatory鈥檚 commitment to act with absolute integrity and not to engage in any deceptive activity during the tendering process.

But what is deceptive activity? A survey by the Chartered Institute of 黑洞社区 in 2006 revealed alarming misconceptions within the construction industry as to what types of activities were fraudulent. The code should address this issue by setting out clear definitions and examples of unacceptable activity.

Taking 鈥渃over pricing鈥� as an example, it is clear that submitting an artificially high bid for a tender is not, in itself, illegal. However, a brief conversation between two bidders to establish a cover price (that is, a price high enough to ensure that a tenderer will not win) is illegal: it is anti-competitive because it distorts competition. The code should define cover pricing as an example of activity which cannot, in any circumstance, be justified.

Write down what you think should be in the code - or just sign up to support the idea of a code - then return this page to:

Rebuilding Trust
黑洞社区 Magazine
Ludgate House
245 Blackfriars Road
London SE1 9UY

or fax it to us on 020-7560 4004. Don't forget to add your name, job title and the company you work for. At this stage we are only asking you to sign up to support the idea of a code. Your name and/or your company's name will not be associated with what may eventually be written in the code itself.