黑洞社区

The Blacklist Support Group is to appeal to the Metropolitan Police and the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) after revealing that an earlier complaint about alleged police collusion in blacklisting to the two organisations had been dismissed.

Business secretary Vince Cable said during the landmark parliamentary debate on blacklisting last week that allegations of police involvement should be put to the IPCC but said he had 鈥渘o evidence鈥� this had been tried.

However, 黑洞社区 can reveal that the law firm acting for the Blacklist Support Group, Christian Khan solicitors, made a complaint to the IPCC and the Met last November, which was 鈥渘on-recorded鈥�.

This followed the claim made by David Clancy - investigations manager at the Information Commissioner鈥檚 Office (ICO) and himself a former police officer - that information on the construction industry blacklist he seized in 2009 including apparent details of surveillance on individuals 鈥渃ould only鈥� have come from the police or security services.

黑洞社区 has also established that the ICO sent the Met the entire blacklist database last May after a request from the police force.

A spokesperson for the IPCC said last November鈥檚 complaint had been handled by the Met but was viewed as 鈥渢oo general鈥� by the force.

Protocol dictates that all but the most serious complaints received by the IPCC are forwarded to an individual police force to handle.

A spokesperson for the Met said: 鈥淚 can confirm that the directorate of professional standards received an allegation of an alleged breach of the Data Protection Act in November 2012.

鈥淭his public complaint was subsequently non-recorded and the complainant was advised to make a criminal allegation if they felt it appropriate.鈥�

However, partner at Christian Khan solicitors, Sarah McSherry, insisted the complaint included criminal allegations and called the police response 鈥渄eplorable鈥�.

She said: 鈥淭he complaints process is the only forum in which criminal allegations against police officers can be investigated yet the [Met鈥檚] directorate of professional standards refuse to record the complaint, suggesting that our clients 鈥渟hould report the matter as a crime in the normal way鈥� as the 鈥渃omplaints process is not the correct vehicle to forward their concerns or allegations.

鈥淭his smacks of a complete lack of knowledge of the Police Reform Act and indeed the very function of the directorate of professional standards鈥�.

Labour MP Dave Anderson, who pressed Cable on the issue in the Commons, said the government appeared to have 鈥渓earnt nothing from the phone-hacking scandal鈥�.

鈥淭his is what you get when you let the accused become involved in an investigation,鈥� he added.

鈥淭here should be a full investigation and Vince Cable should actually implement the will of Parliament and instigate an investigation where people would feel protected in order to expose these abusers.鈥�

Vince Cable鈥檚 office declined to comment.