GLA paper shows 拢150,000 earmarked for leading counsel

View of Foster & Partner's Tulip proposal, seen from Whitechapel High Street

Source: Dbox

View of Foster + Partner's Tulip proposal, seen from Whitechapel High Street

Sadiq Khan is preparing to spend 拢350,000 to defend his decision to refuse planning for Fosters + Partners鈥 controversial Tulip tower.

Last month, Tulip developer, billionaire financier and Gherkin owner Jacob J Safra, formally launched an appeal over its rejected plans.

Now Khan, who recently reiterated his opposition to the 305m-tall tower in a letter to communities secretary Robert Jenrick, who will rule on the 拢350m scheme, has authorised the Greater London Authority to spend up to 拢350,000 to fight the appeal.

A mayoral decision signed last Wednesday has revealed the leading counsel on the appeal will be paid up to 拢150,000.

The mayor is also prepared to shell out 拢60,000 for architectural advice, 拢40,000 for a heritage consultant and 拢25,000 on administration and printing.

The documents said: "The principal objective is to put together an effective high-quality team of external consultants and GLA/TfL officers led by an eminent planning leading counsel capable of defending the decision to refuse planning permission. The expected outcome is a robust and successful defence."

Dates for the hearing have yet to be set.

>> Also read: Khan repeats opposition to Fosters鈥 Tulip
>> Analysis: What is so contentious about the Tulip?

Members of the City鈥檚 planning and transportation committee had given their backing to the project at a meeting last April 鈥 where Historic England鈥檚 concerns over the tower鈥檚 impact on views of the nearby Tower of London world heritage site were rejected.

But the size of the project, which included multiple observation levels 鈥 including external gondolas, a restaurant and 鈥渟ky bar鈥, and education space 鈥 in a 12-storey structure at the top of a slender concrete shaft, meant the City鈥檚 backing was subject to Khan鈥檚 approval.

Last July, the mayor used his planning powers to instruct the City to refuse consent despite their support. Khan said the proposal 鈥渨ould not constitute the high standard of design required for a tall building in this location鈥 and would cause harm to the 鈥渙utstanding universal value鈥 of the Tower of London world heritage site.

Others working on the scheme for Safra include cost consultant Alinea and construction consultant Skanska.

How much it will cost Londoners to defend decision

FeesCost

Leading counsel

拢150,000

Architectural advice

拢60,000

Heritage consultant

拢40,000

Tourism and economic specialist

拢40,000

Administrative and printing

拢25,000

Transport consultant

拢20,000

Contingency

拢15,000

Total

拢350,000