黑洞社区

Labour has called on the UK government to follow the lead set this week by the Welsh government in seeking to exclude contractors with a history of blacklisting from public sector work.

Yesterday Welsh finance minister Jane Hutt told 103 public sector bodies in the country, including local councils, NHS and police organisations, that they can exclude such companies from public contracts unless the firms have 鈥渟elf cleaned鈥� by taking measures such as compensating victims of blacklisting.

The public sector in Wales spends around 拢1bn a year on construction and the action taken by the Welsh government is being seen as the most significant attempt to date to 鈥渂lacklist the blacklisters鈥�.

Labour鈥檚 shadow Welsh secretary Owen Smith said the Welsh government should be 鈥渃ongratulated鈥� for 鈥渢aking the lead to end the scandal of blacklisting once and for all鈥�.

Smith said he would write to business secretary Vince Cable asking him to look at issuing similar guidance.

He said: 鈥淚n contrast the Tory-led UK government has sat on its hands and refused a full investigation. As well as opening this investigation immediately, I would urge ministers in London to look at what Wales has done and issue similar guidance to ensure that those affected by blacklisting receive appropriate redress, and that procurement practices are tightened up to prevent blacklisting.鈥�

The Welsh government鈥檚 鈥減rocurement advice note鈥�, sent to all major public sector clients, sets out the circumstances under which they can exclude firms with a history of blacklisting from public contracts.

It claims that more than 100 of the individuals already identified as being named on the 3,200-strong blacklist held by the now defunct Consulting Association 鈥� which worked for 44 major construction firms until its closure in 2009 鈥� live in Wales.

The note says that contracting authorities can exclude firms under the 2006 Public Contracts Regulations because blacklisting can amount to 鈥済rave misconduct鈥�.

However, it cautions that exclusion must be considered on a 鈥渃ase-by-case basis鈥� and suggests that public bodies seek legal advice.

It also suggests that firms can escape exclusion through other actions, such as putting in place 鈥渟taffing or personnel鈥� measures to avoid recurrence of blacklisting.

Rupert Choat, CMS Cameron McKenna and 黑洞社区 columnist

This is the next step in authorities taking some form of action against blacklisting. It is perhaps a more subtle and more plausible way for contracting authorities to take action rather than banning particular firms.