黑洞社区

Leading retailer John Lewis is considering writing clauses into its construction contracts to allow it to pay subcontractors directly if main contractors are not paying them swiftly enough, 黑洞社区 can reveal.

Industry experts said the plan from the John Lewis Partnership - which includes the expanding Waitrose chain as well as John Lewis stores - would make it one of the first private sector clients to propose such a system and claimed more firms were likely to follow.

The move comes amid mounting concern over cash flows in the sector. Contractors, including Kier, have said their cash flows are being hit because they are under pressure from public sector clients to pay their suppliers more promptly.

Tony Jacob, head of construction for John Lewis Partnership, said the proposal had been prompted by failures in the supply chain causing problems on previous projects.

He said: 鈥淸When payments are late] cash flow suffers, disputes increase and people get distracted from the core activity of designing and building.鈥�

Main contractors play a key role in facilitating but they don鈥檛 do a lot of building

Tony Jacob, John Lewis

Jacob added: 鈥淭he main contractors we use are nothing without the supply chain. They鈥檇 cease to be relevant - certainly on a fit-out job. Main contractors play a key role in facilitating but they don鈥檛 do a lot of building work.鈥�

He said the proposal was under review and a decision would be taken on whether to adopt it in the next couple of months.

Martin Kelly, director at accountant KPMG, said: 鈥淚 think it鈥檚 a well understood concern of the industry that the supply chain is not as well funded as it should be. That鈥檚 something that John Lewis are trying to address.

鈥淚 would not be at all surprised if others do something similar.鈥�

But he said clients taking such an approach would be 鈥渢rading certainty and risk for cost鈥� and would probably have to pay a premium for main contractors to maintain the margins they would lose from holding payments for less time.

Kevin Cammack, analyst at Cenkos, said the move was 鈥減robably a good thing鈥�, adding that it was 鈥渘ot a million miles away from what government is doing on its projects.鈥�

Cammack added, however, that such a system was likely to prove less popular with the biggest commercial developers.