Campaign group seeks judicial review of government鈥檚 decision to give green light to 拢10bn Hinkley plant

hinkey

The government鈥檚 nascent nuclear new build programme suffered a fresh blow this week after it emerged that Greenpeace has launched a legal challenge against EDF鈥檚 拢10bn Hinkley nuclear project.

The challenge is against the government鈥檚 decision to grant planning permission for the new Hinkley Point nuclear power plant on the grounds the government has yet to secure a site to store the plant鈥檚 nuclear waste. If the application for judicial review is granted, the project could be hit by months if not years of legal wrangling as the case is heard in court.

The move comes after 黑洞社区 revealed earlier this month that EDF will not make a final investment decision on the Hinkley nuclear plant project until at least September and is set to cut up to half the staff on the site in Somerset. EDF is still in negotiations with the government over an agreed price for electricity from the plant.

Last year Laing O鈥橰ourke, in partnership with Bouygues, won the 拢2bn main civils contract for the project.

In court papers seen by 黑洞社区, Greenpeace argues that energy secretary Ed Davey 鈥渋mpermissibly put a positive gloss on a number of factual matters and ignored other facts and the context鈥 in his decision to give the go-ahead to the Hinkley project in March this year.

The planning permission came after a decision by Cumbria council in February to withdraw from the process to find a long-term storage site for nuclear waste in its area. Cumbria had been the only area taking part in the process.

The government鈥檚 own policy on nuclear power commits it to 鈥渘eed to be satisfied that effective arrangements exist or will exist to manage and dispose of waste鈥 from new nuclear power plants before giving planning permission.

Greenpeace argued that Cumbria鈥檚 decision meant this test could not have been met and the government 鈥渇ailed to take into account or recognise the true significance of [Cumbria鈥檚] decision鈥.

It said: 鈥淥ver nearly 40 years the government has found it impossible, no matter the gloss it puts on it and despite intensive and expensive efforts [鈥 to find any site specific solution to, or to make any real progress on finding any such solution, to the problem of 鈥榙isposing鈥 safely of legacy waste.鈥

Leila Deen, Greenpeace energy campaigner, told 黑洞社区 that the government 鈥渁ppears to have proceeded on the basis of 鈥榦ptimism鈥 that a waste facility can be found鈥.

鈥淏ut with Cumbria council having refused to host one, and no other candidate site on the table, there is absolutely no basis for that optimism,鈥 she said.

The government鈥檚 defence, filed at the High Court, said there was 鈥渘o sustainable basis鈥 for the judicial review and it should be dismissed.

The government鈥檚 defence pointed to the fact that in May it had put out a consultation on how the process to find a nuclear waste storage site could be modified to help it progress.

NNB Generation Company, the vehicle developing the scheme in which EDF is the majority shareholder, submitted arguments supporting the government.

It said: 鈥淭he very nature of the voluntary approach to finding a [storage site] adopted by the secretary of state is that there may well be setbacks along the way, and volunteer communities can withdraw right up to the start of construction.鈥