All Letters articles – Page 89

  • Comment

    A more constructive exchange …

    2005-05-20T00:00:00Z

    We, as committee members of The National Association of Women in Construction (NAWIC) in the South-east, have read the recent exchanges about women in construction on the letters pages of ڶ with some dismay.

  • Comment

    Best Practice, best brand

    2005-05-20T00:00:00Z

    I write with regard to the ever-changing branding of the crusade that is currently known as Constructing Excellence, was Rethinking Construction, grew out of Sir John Egan’s report, and began as Latham’s Constructing the Team.

  • Comment

    Socs’ appeal

    2005-05-20T00:00:00Z

    I was glad to see that the campaign has finally been launched for my RIBA gold medal for my work on adult erotic emporium Hustler Hollywood in Soho (6 May, page 33). I’ve been campaigning for years. Socrates Miltiadou, Papa Architects

  • Comment

    ‘Tesco law’ is already online

    2005-05-20T00:00:00Z

    Andrew Hemsley, in his discussion on the future of legal services (29 April, page 55), is already out of date.

  • Comment

    Try a no-fee solution

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    I was puzzled by Alan Danieli’s article and the pessimistic conclusion that his company would be unable to sustain the likely legal costs required to recover the sums due to it.

  • Comment

    Head for the homeowners contract

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    My heart went out to this small contractor whose story I hear echoed by countless clients, some like him, others – often pensioners or those on low incomes – who have been ripped off by contractors less conscientious than Mr Danieli.

  • Comment

    Threaten bankruptcy proceeding

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    I sympathise with Mr Danieli over his inability to collect monies due to him from unscrupulous clients.

  • Comment

    Argue the case yourself

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    Mr Danieli is obviously very articulate.

  • Comment

    And another thing …

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    In response to Peter Duckett’s letter calling on specialists to get tough (29 April, page 38): how about specialists doing what they tendered for and not strong-arming medium and smaller contractors, and some larger ones, to get their own way?

  • Comment

    Standard alert

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    Publication of the European standard for external rendering, coming at a time when new ڶ Regulations are being issued thick and fast, may get overlooked by some.

  • Comment

    Go to the adjudicator

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    It made me sad to read the story of Alan Danieli, the small builder being driven out of business by unpaid accounts.

  • Comment

    Subbies of the world unite

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    In response to your question “Are specialists right to get tough?” (15 April, page 15) I am surprised that it has taken them this long.

  • Comment

    The Prince and the Peabody, part II

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    In light of your reference a while back to The Prince of Wales “loathing” BedZed and not caring about green building issues (Hansom, 7 January, page 23), I thought you would want to be aware for future reference that: The Prince of Wales has a well-documented passion for environmental concerns ...

  • Comment

    Let’s not be hasty

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    I read the spat in your letters pages between Roger Knowles and Sarah Bourne on women in construction.

  • Comment

    This kite won’t fly

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    The item on the early publication of a report by the government on modern methods of construction (8 April, page 24) refers to a “kitemark” scheme that is to be developed for MMC.

  • Comment

    Flimsy

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    Here we go again! Bill Dunster is claiming that lightweight modern construction methods are “guaranteed to require electrically powered air-conditioning within a few decades” (15 April, page 42).

  • Comment

    Blockheaded thinking

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    A recent issue published a letter from the president of the Brick and Block Association explaining that bricks and blocks were sustainable products (8 April, page 40).

  • Comment

    Beware the marketeer

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    Andrew Hill in his letter concerning revisions to PPG3 (April 15, page 40), dismissively and wrongly considered that local authorities do not have the ability to determine housing needs and will make prejudiced decisions.

  • Comment

    Apologies to Hazlin

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    I have just read the article concerning radio frequency identity technology (22 April, pages 62-64. I spoke to one of your journalists regarding the use of RFID. Unfortunately, our company name has been spelled Gazlin, and not Hazlin. It would have been nice to see our name in your distinguished ...

  • Comment

    A welcome review

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    All chartered surveyors will be subject to the same conduct and practice requirements, not just QSs. So why the silly headline?