All Letters articles 鈥� Page 88
-
Comment
When the wind doesn鈥檛 blow
You have asked for opinions on starting a new nuclear power station program (20 May, page 13).
-
Comment
Standard bearer
I find it difficult to understand why Alan Thomas (Letters, 29 April, page 39) doesn鈥檛 think the BRE certification scheme could work for modern methods of construction, particularly as he quotes Peter Hewlett鈥檚 paper detailing the methodology of the British Board of Agr茅ment鈥檚 approval scheme.
-
Comment
Bingham bashing
I was the architect involved in the case that Tony Bingham wrote about in his article 鈥淭oo much to ask for鈥� (27 May, page 48).
-
Comment
Plumbers鈥� plight
The skills shortage in the construction industry is a crisis with far-reaching implications (13 May, page 14).
-
Comment
Target the individual
Your leader and the article on the impending corporate manslaughter bill suggest that the measures are welcomed by the industry (20 May, page14).
-
Comment
Happy returns
It is good to see that Willmott Dixon has increased its pre-tax profit to more than 拢10m (13 May, page 22). You quote Rick Willmott saying this 2.5% margin is 鈥渁s good as you鈥檒l get in construction鈥�. But why is this the case?
-
Comment
The final word 鈥�
As aired in your letters pages (13 May, pages 38-39) Mr Danieli could have had the right of adjudication against his two non-paying customers had anyone told him of the standard form of building contract for a home owner/occupier as published by the JCT in 1999, priced 拢9.99 and available ...
-
Comment
How to follow an impressive debut
May I ask what steps are being taken to ensure the Redrow Debut homes remain affordable for future buyers (20 May, page 21).
-
Comment
A clarification
With regard to the article on Greenwich Millennium Village, Powerwall Systems Ltd did not design the building with the problem.
-
Comment
Bunch of lightweights
Well, what a surprise 鈥� the unfortunate people living in flats separated by lightweight floors at Greenwich Millennium Village can hear their neighbours!
-
Comment
A load of crystal balls
To make clients responsible for the health, safety and welfare of the principal contractor, its subcontractors and their employees 鈥� does this branch out to include visitors and the general public? 鈥� during the construction phase of the works is flawed. Are the CDM regulators going to provide crystal balls ...
-
Comment
One simple question
A property can meet all the regulations and still not meet the expectations of the occupants (that is, to live within their own property without being disturbed by their neighbours鈥� day-to-day activities).
-
Comment
The meaning of success
Your description of Dalston City Partnership as successful is not entirely accurate.
-
Comment
Fuming at the F-word 鈥�
You ask: 鈥淲ill top-up fees damage architecture?鈥� (13 May, page 17). The answer is yes.
-
Comment
An education in form filling
You report that the education sector may be about to embrace an 鈥淣HS Procure21-style鈥� strategy for the procurement of its buildings (6 May, page 11).
-
Comment
An inspector calls
The article in last week鈥檚 issue 鈥淐ITB hits back at criticism of craft apprenticeships鈥� (20 May, page 17) is inaccurate and misleading.
-
Comment
Sound arguments
As a manufacturer of light gauge steel-framed (LGSF) buildings I feel obliged to comment on the problems that have arisen after completion of the Kirby Court contract at Greenwich Millennium Village (6 May, pages 26-29).
-
Comment
Another fine mess
The reason why women are not attracted to working in the building industry is that they have an in-built gene that prevents them from accepting untidiness 鈥� ask any married man (20 May, page 40). Most building sites are the untidiest places on earth.Mike Brown, principal clerk of works, Estates ...
-
CommentThe Danieli debate
Small builder Alan Danieli touched a nerve a few weeks ago when he wrote about 鈥榗owboy clients鈥�. Here he thanks readers for their advice and support, while suggestions keep coming in 鈥�