黑洞社区

The CITB estimates that the industry needs to train 182,000 people in the next five years to meet the likely demand for skills from a newly growing industry. But the body, which collects the annual 拢170m levy from industry used to subsidise training in trade and professional skills, has long been subject to criticism from the firms that pay the charge - 0.5% on every employee鈥檚 wage bill. Employers complain that the way the charge is levied is unfair, and the way grants are handed out is bureaucratic, unhelpful and poorly targeted.

For employees themselves, the result is that many employers don鈥檛 know or don鈥檛 claim what help is available to them, meaning opportunities to train staff are lost.

However, with a new chief executive in place since April, and industry and government clear that change is needed, the CITB is starting to reform. It has already outlined plans to change the way the levy is collected that will see some small businesses pay less but others - such as large labour-only subcontractors - that are now exempt, paying into the levy for the first time. It is also planning to radically simplify the way funds are then redistributed to the industry, making it easier for small businesses to get their fair share of grants.

黑洞社区 spoke to the CITB鈥檚 policy director Steve Radley, and Colin Chaplin, levy development manager, to find out what changes are planned and how they will affect employers and staff in the sector.

Q What are the main changes proposed for the levy?
A The changes comprise three technical tweaks designed to make collection of the levy more straightforward to calculate and collect.

The levy is currently raised at a rate of 0.5% of wages paid to workers on PAYE, and 1.5% for those employed by labour-only subcontractors. In future there will be no special rate for labour-only subcontractors, but individuals or companies registered under HM Revenue & Customs鈥� Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) will pay at 1.25%. This allows CITB to stop spending time trying to prove firms fit the definition of labour-only subcontractors, and enables them to levy charges based on the returns already produced to comply with the CIS.

The second change is to the exemption from the levy currently enjoyed by labour-only subcontractors where the main contractor also pays the levy, called an 鈥渙ffset mechanism鈥�. This offset mechanism is being abolished, meaning a worker providing labour via a labour-only subcontractor may incur the levy twice, albeit paid once by the main contractor, and once by the subcontractor - never twice by the same company.

Currently firms with a wage bill under 拢80k per annum do not pay the levy, and those with a wage bill of 拢80k-拢100k have a 50% discount. The third change is that this discount is being extended to firms with wage bills of between 拢80k and 拢400k.

Q Who will benefit?
A In total the CITB says the changes will not increase the amount of money collected by the levy, though they will change how much some individual businesses contribute. The CITB says that 84% of construction employers will pay the same or less under the proposed changes. Those to benefit most will be small businesses with wage bills of between 拢100k and 拢400k per annum who will be eligible for a 50% discount to the levy for the first time. The CITB鈥檚 Chaplin says 鈥渟everal thousand鈥� firms will be helped by the extension to the levy discount.

Q Who will pay more?
A The CITB estimates that about 2,500 firms that formerly benefitted from the offset mechanism, many of whom will be large labour-only subcontractors, will now be liable to pay the levy. Chaplin says: 鈥淭here鈥檚 a small minority, about 4-5% of employers that currently benefit from that offset mechanism, and pay no levy as a result. Clearly, they鈥檙e going to start paying levy. We鈥檙e talking about sizable businesses who could have payments to a workforce of 拢8m but don鈥檛 pay levy. We鈥檙e not increasing the levy income as a result of this, we鈥檙e spreading the load across a broader number of employers.鈥�

Q When does this happen?
A Payments under the new system will not be due until the early part of 2017. However, the payment levied at that time will be calculated upon the people employed by registered businesses between April 2015 and March 2016, so businesses have only a limited amount of time if they wish to adjust how they operate to incorporate the planned changes. The CITB has already written to all 75,000 registered employers, and is about to send another mail-out specifically to those 2,500 it estimates are likely to pay more. The CITB鈥檚 Radley says: 鈥淲e鈥檝e done extensive modelling to identify who鈥檚 affected, and spent a lot of time communicating it. Some businesses as a result of this may change some aspects of their operating model, and they鈥檝e got plenty of time to do that now, as we鈥檝e been up front with our communication.鈥�

Q Why is the CITB also planning to change the way funding is divested?
A Employers access the money raised by the levy by applying for grants, which are available via around 60 separate funding pots. According to Radley, while the CITB retains the industry鈥檚 support for the overall system of levy and grants, CITB needs to get better at reflecting the specific skills needs of the industry, and the complex landscape of different funding pots requires radical simplification in order to be accessible, particular to smaller employers.

To do this, he says the CITB is reviewing how to change the system to ensure both that grant schemes are 鈥渃o-designed鈥� with industry and that they make use of forecasting tools so that relevant training is available in advance of the industry鈥檚 likely need for a particular skill set.

In addition it wants to simplify the process of obtaining funds so that smaller businesses aren鈥檛 put off. 鈥淲e need to ensure that we don鈥檛 prevent companies from taking advantage of the support that鈥檚 there because the criteria either doesn鈥檛 fit the way they train or we force them to jump through so many hoops they just think it鈥檚 not worth the bother of doing it,鈥� says Radley.

Q How will the way employers access funding change?
A The CITB hasn鈥檛 yet determined exactly how the reforms to funding will work, but it has some core outcomes it wants to achieve, such as collaborating more with industry, and making the bidding process simpler. Radley says that there will be 鈥渧astly fewer鈥� than the 60 current funding pots, with number streamlined 鈥渋deally鈥� to fewer than 10. It will also stop attempting to replicate other public or private sector training provision that already exists. In the past, CITB has refused to support training by external providers that it also provides. 鈥淚 think that鈥檚 a genuine concern and one we need to address,鈥� says Radley. 鈥淲e should be providing training directly to [the industry] if we鈥檙e in the best position to do that, but we should also be providing signposting to other sources of training if that best meets their need. Ultimately we鈥檙e here to address market failure. Everything we do should be additional to what the market will provide. If there鈥檚 better ways or the [external] training鈥檚 more relevant or more competitive, then that鈥檚 clearly the route they should go down.鈥� As a result of the reforms, he says, he anticipates more funding will in future go to the small businesses that currently get less than 50% of training support.

Q Will employers have a say in the way things will change?
A The CITB is promising to consult before undertaking any reforms to the way grants are allocated. Radley says the body is already taking soundings on how to reform the system, and that a more formal consultation on changes will be issued next year, which the industry will be encouraged to respond to. The body doesn鈥檛 intend to institute any changes until 2016.