As main contractor on the delayed Wembley stadium and chief player in the legal battle afterwards, Multiplex became a byword for tough contracting. But 10 years on the firm is set to become a 拢1bn turnover contractor noted for its considerate approach. So, what happened?
It鈥檚 time to forget everything you thought you knew about Brookfield Multiplex.
The contractor鈥檚 name is inextricably linked to the Wembley stadium build 鈥 probably the most notorious problem project in the whole of UK construction in the last 20 years. The delays and cost overruns racked up in completing the UK鈥檚 national football stadium sparked a huge legal fight on multiple fronts, including a 拢253m battle with engineer Mott MacDonald after Multiplex filed the biggest law suit in UK construction history. With many of the details played out publicly in court, the various rows sullied the reputation of many involved and cost the Australian main contractor responsible for the build - then called Multiplex - an eye-watering sum understood to be in excess of 拢200m, despite the fact it scored partial victories in many of the court battles. Payouts included 拢63m to the listed firm鈥檚 shareholders who had sued it for failing to inform them of problems.
Meanwhile some specialist contractors started shunning a firm whose conduct the judge, Mr Justice Jackson, described in the court battle against steel contractor CBUK, as 鈥渞uthless鈥 and 鈥渄eplorable鈥 even though ultimately legal. He said there were several opportunities to resolve the dispute, but that he had 鈥渘ever before seen parties so devoted to litigation for its own sake鈥. Many assumed that Multiplex鈥檚 foray into the UK market, begun only in 1999, would never recover.
However, fast-forward a decade and Multiplex, now owned by Canadian investment giant Brookfield Asset Management and known as Brookfield Multiplex (BM), is confounding its one-time critics and looking for all the world like the ultimate comeback kid.
We made errors in our UK market entry. We took on Wembley at an aggressive price and risk profile, and it went pear-shaped due to a number of factors
Ashley Muldoon, Brookfield Multiplex
The firm, whose UK revenue fell to 拢150m as recently as 2010, is confidently expecting to turn over more than 拢1bn next year in UK, with a roster of high-profile projects for the UK鈥檚 bluest of blue-chip clients. This was cemented last month by the confirmation of its role on the city of London鈥檚 next mega-project: 22 Bishopsgate, formerly known as the Pinnacle. When other contractors have been shrinking, the last five years have seen the firm grow faster than many of its peers while building a reputation not only for reliable delivery, but also - shock horror - for the openness and transparency of its relationships with clients and the supply chain. Multiplex鈥檚 spectacular rebirth raises questions not only of how on Earth it has been achieved, but also whether it is both genuine and sustainable.
The story of Wembley, the contract for which Multiplex was awarded in 2002, is well known. Aside from the enormous cost to Multiplex - more than all but the largest contractors could bear - the public court battle cemented in the minds of the industry a perception of it as aggressive and hardnosed - a main contractor it was dangerous to work for. One boss of a major formwork contractor, which refused to price for Multiplex at the time, says: 鈥淲e had a very negative opinion of Multiplex. They were very hard.鈥 Gerry O鈥橞rien, partner in engineer AKT2, who has nothing but good things to say of BM now, says: 鈥淲e did not work with them during the Multiplex years, but it appeared from the outside that there were cultural challenges with the UK market. It鈥檚 a relatively small pool in the UK and relationships really matter.鈥
Life after Wembley
When Multiplex鈥檚 Australian parent realised things on Wembley were starting to go awry in early 2003 they drafted in one of the firm鈥檚 rising stars from the homeland, Ashley Muldoon, to take over the UK business. Muldoon, now chief executive for BM in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, has overseen the business ever since. Speaking to 黑洞社区, publicity-shy Muldoon accepts the firm had got things wrong. 鈥淲e made errors in our UK market entry. We took on Wembley at an aggressive price and risk profile, and it went pear-shaped due to a number of factors. But we also realised that we couldn鈥檛 come in and work like an Australian contractor, we had to adapt to the UK environment [鈥 What clients wanted in the Australian market wasn鈥檛 what was wanted at the time in the UK,鈥 he says.
When in 2006, after a restructure, Multiplex said it was now focusing 鈥減redominantly鈥 on building out the projects of the firm鈥檚 development arm, some thought it was the beginning of the end of the company as a UK contracting force. But it was in 2007, says Muldoon, that the company really consolidated and took stock of its Wembley experience, and formed the strategy to rebuild the business in the UK. 鈥淲e were the black sheep of the family here in the UK. But we looked at our mistakes and decided we were not going to go back to Australia with our tail between our legs,鈥 he says.
鈥淲e took time to understand what had happened. We had to understand the clients, consultants and the suppliers chain and what drove them. If you鈥檝e been to hell and come back you learn.鈥
He even worked out how to turn the Wembley story into a demonstration of Multiplex鈥檚 commitment to the UK. When it finally opened in 2007 it was a popular success; who else, the argument went, would have stuck to the task and not walked away from the job given such problems? This fightback was announced in spectacular fashion in the same year by the firm winning the 拢575m contract to build the Pinnacle tower for Arab Investments (AI). Multiplex鈥檚 argument was making headway, as AI鈥檚 managing director Khalid Afara recognised at the time. 鈥淓veryone makes mistakes, but it鈥檚 how you deal with them that matters. They did not walk away [from Wembley], and in the end they finished the project to an extremely high standard.鈥
While this UK strategy review was happening Multiplex was bought by Brookfield Asset Management for around 拢3bn, changing its name to Brookfield Multiplex (BM). Its new parent not only backed the UK strategy of BM despite all the ongoing post-Wembley legal shenanigans - which were not finally resolved until 2010 - but ultimately its financial strength allowed the global BM business to provide a group indemnity against all future Wembley-related claims, effectively safeguarding the contractor鈥檚 future in the UK. The strength of the balance sheet of Brookfield Asset Management, which manages $200bn of assets across the world, remains a key selling point of BM.
A new way
But what was the new strategy? The plan was to become a boutique construction business with the technical capability to take on the biggest and most complex building projects. Perhaps most surprising was that the BM pitch would be to be construction partner that was fundamentally open, with solid relationships down the supply chain - far removed from the old Multiplex鈥檚 reputation. Much of BM鈥檚 current success seems to be down to the fact that, so far at least, it has lived up to its sales pitch. The same subcontractor that in the early 2000s refused to price for Multiplex, says: 鈥淭he have a completely different reputation now. They are a very different firm, everyone I speak to says so.鈥 Another current regular subcontractor says: 鈥淭here鈥檚 no hangover from Wembley now. They have a very good reputation and are a quality outfit.鈥
They talk a lot about their relationship with their supply chain. I genuinely think they have changed
James Pellatt, head of projects at Great Portland Estates
James Pellatt, head of projects at Great Portland Estates, which is working with BM on 100 Bishopsgate and 73/89 Oxford Street, agrees: 鈥淭hey talk a lot about their relationship with their supply chain. I genuinely think they have changed, because we check. They pay well and they pay on time, and they鈥檝e been quite good at opening up their supply chain to new entrants.鈥
BM has also impressed clients with a strong technical ability and a straightforward commerical attitude to projects underpinned, according to well-placed market sources, by the fact it unashamedly asks for a higher profit margin than most of its rivals, bar Sir Robert McAlpine. GPE鈥檚 Pellatt says: 鈥淭hey鈥檙e a very good two-stage contractor, they鈥檙e extremely easy to negotiate with. They do it in as open-book a way as I鈥檝e seen, which allows you to have an open debate and dialogue about risk.鈥
Underscoring its progress as it prepared to expand were key figures such as Laing O鈥橰ourke鈥檚 Ross Ballingall, lured to Multiplex in 2006 and made Muldoon鈥檚 European managing director in 2011, and hires including former Bovis Lend Lease operations director Tim Atkinson.
Core to the execution of the strategy seems to have been a ruthless focusing on identifying the UK鈥檚 most important construction clients, and slowly and deliberately rebuilding the firm鈥檚 reputation with them. The construction director at one major UK developer says: 鈥淎shley is incredibly well-connected. He spent a long time finding out who the serious people in UK development are, and fixing his relationship with them. And he hasn鈥檛 taken work for [just] anyone.鈥
In Muldoon鈥檚 own words part of this was about identifying long-term players that could become repeat clients. 鈥淩oss Ballingall and I spent time meeting clients, finding out who were creating great products and growing, who would still be developing in the lesser times. [We asked] who are those clients and how do we get closer to them?鈥
The road to recovery
Nevertheless, the journey has been very far from plain sailing. The landmark Pinnacle deal turned into an expensive false start when the funders halted construction in 2012, with BM understood to have been left around 拢20m out of pocket. BM managed to get the debt turned into a second charge on the project, but it was eventually repaid the money only when the scheme was bought by fund manager Axa earlier this year.
It was the 2009 signing of a deal to undertake the 拢840m construction of the New South Glasgow hospital campus that finally put it on the road to recovery, and kept it busy during the recession. But it is only in the last 18 months that this preparation has borne fruit, as clients have pushed ahead with projects a long time in the gestation. From turning over 拢295m in 2013, the last period for which it has accounts filed, Muldoon says the company will turn over 拢750m this year. With around 480 staff and a workbook - by which he means deals actually signed or at preferred bidder stage - of 拢3bn, next year he confidently expects to turn over 拢1bn-1.2bn, which he says is the 鈥渋deal size鈥 for the business. Having virtually reached this scale he says BM is now just 鈥渟electively bidding.鈥 鈥淲e鈥檙e not going out hunting for work,鈥 he says.
Ashley is incredibly well-connected. He spent a long time finding out who the serious people in UK development are, and fixing his relationship with them
UK developer source
With its roster of jobs including work for Almacantar, Berkeley and two projects for Derwent, including its 鈥淲hite Collar Factory鈥 concept on London鈥檚 so-called 鈥淪ilicon roundabout鈥, BM is in the premium tier of major project contractors, including Mace, McAlpine, Skanska, Laing O鈥橰ourke and Lend Lease, which are considered for the biggest London projects. Pellatt says BM is now 鈥渙ne of the most pre-eminent contractors in London.鈥 AKT2鈥檚 O鈥橞rien says: 鈥淲e are currently working with BM on two exceptionally challenging projects in London and have experienced none of the perceived tensions of their earlier contracts. They鈥檙e technically up to the challenge, and in amongst a group of only four or five who are.鈥
The only question that remains is whether Brookfield Multiplex鈥檚 rapid expansion in recent years will, as so many other contractors before have found, leave it exposed as skills shortages bite and the cost of subcontract packages shoot up. Muldoon says Brookfield Multiplex has prepared carefully for its expansion, recruiting before the market started heating up more widely, and is meticulous about ensuring the people that it tells clients will work on their jobs are actually made available. 鈥淲e鈥檙e not worried about delivery. Clients aren鈥檛 silly. If we couldn鈥檛 put forward a team then clients wouldn鈥檛 be asking us to do the work.鈥
Again, so far, Muldoon鈥檚 comments appear to check out. Pellatt says GPE has no concerns about Brookfield鈥檚 capacity, and while O鈥橞rien says it is always possible to ask questions of fast-growing contractors, BM鈥檚 global reach gives it distinct advantages over its peers. 鈥淏M seems to use its Australian connections to access people outside of the UK and bring them in. Clients are so concerned about who the team is going to be at the moment, but BM seems to be offering that longevity with key staff,鈥 he says.
So at the moment BM鈥檚 star is very much in the ascendant. And Wembley seems a very distant memory. 鈥淵ou鈥檙e the first person that鈥檚 asked about Wembley in the last three years,鈥 says Muldoon. At the moment, it seems likely to stay that way.
No comments yet