Share prices are on the up, thanks to healthy order books and the stamp duty holiday surge, says 黑洞社区 Value鈥檚 Tony Williams

Bus bunching is a mathematical inevitability according to academics, but in layman鈥檚 terms it goes like this: 鈥測ou wait ages for a bus and then three or four come along at once鈥. So, it is with housebuilder鈥檚 trading updates: five last including three on Thursday.

Tony Williams

Four from five share prices rose by between 5% and 17% (only Springfield fell). These share prices also largely ignored the inevitable confirmation that trading in the previous six months (pretty much calendar H1 2020) was dreadful with unit sales dropping by 25% (Springfield) to a shocking 63% (Vistry). Springfield also nobly, and unilaterally, fessed up to a 40% drop in PBT (which is also why its share price fell).

There was, however, much better news on orders with gains of 15% (Persimmon), 25% (Barratt) and an extraordinary 66% (Gleeson) for total of  拢7bn plus, with Barratt accounting for almost half of this tally. Oddly, though, Springfield and Vistry provided no annualised order book comparatives.

A slowing residential market and its subsequent on cash flow can very quickly impact housebuilder鈥 debt levels

Like-for-like or not, these order book data drove share prices with Barratt, for example, jumping 8% on Monday of last week, the day of its announcement. And, the rally then became wind-assisted on Friday as destination Stamp Duty Holiday was digested (following Thursday PM鈥檚 announcement). In fact, the UK housebuilding sector enjoyed it third best ever weekly rise in value last week, going up 9.2% or 拢3.2bn.

Juxtaposing the spectacular retreat of volumes in H1 with these burgeoning order books under scores the nature of 2020鈥檚 difficulties; and its stark contrast with the global financial crisis 2008 through 2010 (and maybe till 2012). This latest economic collapse was artificially created by a self-induced economic freeze, not an asset bubble or fundamental economic factor; and like condensation on a charabanc windscreen, it is transitory.

Take Experian鈥檚 forecast, by way of example (and I work with them on these numbers). GDP will collapse 15% this year; but then rise 15% next; and it is the direction of travel which is important rather than the actual digit.

Similarly, private housebuilding output will tank 35% in 2020 before rising 25% in 2021. Consensus earnings growth for the UK housebuilding sector points to a 40% drop this year (and it could be more); before rising 60% next. No coincidence then, that the word 鈥渟trong鈥 was used a total of 36 times in five trading updates.

Trading Update analysis    
  Share price % change H1 change Orderbook Orderbook
  on 10 July in Week 28 in units sold   % change YoY
Barratt 543.6 10.9 -29% 拢3,250 million 25%
Gleeson 692 4.8 -30% 拢145 million 53%
Persimmon 2635 16.6 -35% 拢1,860 million 15%
Springfield* 94 -0.5 -25% 拢110 million Not provided
Vistry 720 5.7 -63% 拢1,660 million Not provided
* Springfield鈥檚 orderbook % change is for annual revenue to 31 May  

Balance sheets

Debt levels are also an increasing focus - a slowing residential market and its subsequent impact on cash flow can very quickly impact housebuilder鈥 debt levels. That said, three of companies which reported in the week hold net cash. Balance sheets (unlike profit and loss accounts) represent a single day in a company鈥檚 year. It is thus helpful for housebuilders to divulge, in addition to cash or debt levels, their level of 鈥榣and creditors鈥.

These represent agreed transactions with land owners which have not yet been paid for. Barratt, for example, has 拢800m of land creditors (of which 拢350m will fall due in its fiscal year H1 to 31 December).

However, even if Barratt settled all its land creditors today, pro-forma balance sheet gearing would only be about 13%, meaning net debt as a percentage of net assets. For the record, too, only 拢250m of Barratt鈥檚 land creditors falls due before 31 December. At the same time, Persimmon鈥檚 land creditors total 拢370m of which 拢120m falls due this year. Inexplicably, again, is the fact that both Springfield and Vistry do not indicate their levels of land creditors.

BALANCE SHEET TABLE 
  Net debt Land creditors
  or net cash  
Barratt 拢305 million 拢800 million
Gleeson 拢77 million Not provided
Persimmon 拢830 million 拢370 million
Springfield 拢85 million Not provided
Vistry 拢355 million Not provided

Tony Williams, CEO, 黑洞社区 Value Ltd