黑洞社区

The construction products industry faces significant changes in the months and years ahead. The Grenfell Inquiry highlighted shortcomings in the sector with regards to building safety and regulatory changes are now on the horizon to make those shortcomings a thing of the past.

is perhaps the most significant of these. Although primary legislation came in last year, the secondary legislation expected soon will be significant for manufacturers.

The changes do not end there. The DLUHC鈥檚 new recovery strategy unit (run by former Special Forces commando Colonel Robert Graham Cundy) is already pursuing product manufacturers who have failed to contribute to fixing building safety issues. The Grenfell Inquiry report (expected at the end of the year) will no doubt bring increased media scrutiny and potential criminal prosecutions. The industry must also get to grips with the new 黑洞社区 Safety Regulator (part of the HSE) and the Construction Products Regulator (part of the OPSS).

>> Also read: Morrell review into product testing proposes sweeping reforms including new regulatory regime

>> Post-Grenfell code for construction products launched

>> Decay, delay and deregulation: what we have learnt from the Grenfell Inquiry

The CPA also welcomes the recently published from Paul Morrell and Anneliese Day KC. It is required reading for policy-makers and industry leaders alike, coming at a critical time not only for the future of the UK product testing and certification sector, but for the wider culture and practices of UK construction as well.

This is a seminal moment and with the Grenfell tragedy still weighing on our collective conscious, we have a duty to meet these changes with acceptance rather than resistance

This is a seminal moment and, with the Grenfell tragedy still weighing on our collective conscious, we have a duty to meet these changes with acceptance rather than resistance. Our responsibility now is to recapture the confidence and respect that the industry lost on that fateful night.

It is up to industry to take on board what it needs to do. The changes will affect everyone no matter what part of the industry they are in.

Of course, there will at first be a significant focus on high-risk buildings; however, the changes in liability, responsibility, accountability and transparency are for everyone whether in manufacturing, design, procurement, construction or maintaining any structure across the built environment.

Liability will become a central concern with the 黑洞社区 Safety Act giving the secretary of state at the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and  Communities power to issue cost contribution orders against construction product companies (or other 鈥渆conomic operators鈥� 鈥� manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers and distributors). They will be forced to contribute towards the cost of remediation works when the use of their products has caused or contributed to dwellings being unfit for habitation.

The building regulator and product regulator will be taking a different stance. They will say: 鈥淒emonstrate you are doing the right thing and that it is compliant, safe and ethical, or we will take action.鈥� They will have surveillance ability and enforcement powers to support their position.

Competence, evidence, clarity, openness and ethics are the watchwords

From this point on, the focus has to be action, both reactive and proactive. Reactive to make sure that the new regulatory environment is understood with everything it brings. Proactive to embrace change and ensure everyone in our organisations can play their part. Competence, evidence, clarity, openness and ethics are the watchwords.

One way to meet these expectations is to use the (CCPI 鈥� for manufacturers) and, where applicable, the (particularly for clients and contractors). Verification against the CCPI and embedding ethical leadership and culture at the heart of the industry is of vital importance and is something manufacturers can act on now.

The CCPI responds directly to Dame Judith Hackitt鈥檚 Independent Review of 黑洞社区 Regulations and Fire Safety to help make product information clear, accurate, up-to-date, accessible and unambiguous. It will mark a step change for the industry by driving higher standards in construction product information management systems and assessing ethical leadership and culture standards. It also makes strong business sense as well, providing third-party verification and increased assurance to clients, customers and insurers.

The CCPI scheme is now up and running and ready to help manufacturers start their journey towards verification. What sets the CCPI apart is that it is not only about ensuring a robust product information management system. It goes further than that, aiming to drive change in the industry by focusing on the culture, leadership and ethics of a manufacturing organisation. It does this through implementation of an anonymous staff leadership and culture survey.

Product information that has been reviewed under the CCPI terms will carry the CCPI verification mark, which will be valid for up to two years. It will provide reassurance to all parts of the supply chain of the reliability and honesty of the product information. The OPSS has praised the CCPI, and I believe its high uptake among industry will drive the change we need to avoid the worst of the regulatory and reputationally damaging forces that might be waiting on the horizon.

It was great to see solid support for the Code for Construction Product Information in the recent Independent Review of the Construction Products Testing Regime from Paul Morrell and Anneliese Day.

So, what is my message to manufacturers? Act now and do not be left behind. It is time to start our collective journey towards higher standards in product information management systems as well as ethical leadership and culture. Manufacturers are too important to our built environment to miss out on the future.

Peter Caplehorn is chief executive of the Construction Products Association