- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
- Comment
- Programmes
- CPD
- 黑洞社区 the Future
- Data
2024 events calendar
黑洞社区 Awards
Keep up to date
- 黑洞社区 Boardroom
Architectural practice Architype scoops the prime position in this year鈥檚 guide, proving itself to be a truly inspiring employer. Followed by runners-up Cullinan Studio, JTP, Assael Architecture and Alinea.
Below you will find an interactive table containing data for all 50 of this year's Good Employers. See key on right for what each symbol represents. You are able to see further details of each employer, including what they say about themselves, by clicking on their names.
Company | Staff turnover | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3PM | 0% | 13 | 26 days | 40 hours | DCSP(C)/GPP(C) | 18% | 0% | none | all | all | none | all | all | all |
8build | 24% | 104 | 25 days | 80 hours | PP(C) | 14% | 15% | 9 | all | all | some | all | none | all |
AA Projects | 9% | 89 | 30 days | 48 hours | GPP(C) | 9% | 8% | 9 | all | all | all | all | all | all |
Alinea | 3% | 73 | 30 days | 85 hours | GPP | 16% | 11% | 4 | all | none | none | none | all | all |
Architype | 5% | 50 | 25 days | 49 hours | DCSP(C) | 58% | 14% | 1 | all | all | none | some | some | some |
Assael Architecture | 14% | 81 | 40 days | 61 hours | CP(C) | 29% | 8% | 13 | all | some | none | all | all | all |
bptw partnership | 15% | 105 | 28 days | 38 hours | PP | 47% | 12% | 17 | some | all | none | all | all | all |
Built Environment Design Partnership | 0% | 28 | 35 days | 110 hours | DCSP(C)/GPP(C) | 23% | 17% | 3 | all | all | all | none | none | all |
Buro Four | 12% | 91 | 29 days | 50 hours | GPP(NC) | 26% | 17% | 7 | some | some | some | all | all | all |
Couch Perry Wilkes | 9% | 225 | 30 days | 75 hours | CP/DCSP/MP/ PP/CP/GPP(NC+C) | 12% | 4% | 20 | all | all | all | some | all | all |
Croudace Homes | 9% | 245 | 28 days | 150 hours | GPP(NC+C) | 35% | 2% | 22 | some | all | none | some | some | some |
Cullinan Studio | 18% | 37 | 35 days | 50 hours | MP(C)/DCSP(NC) | 45% | 24% | 3 | some | all | all | none | all | all |
Curtins Consulting | 18% | 342 | 30 days | 25 hours | GPP(C) | 12% | 7% | 24 | all | all | none | some | none | some |
DBK Partners | 13% | 145 | 40 days | 35 hours | MP(C) | 12% | 9% | 7 | some | all | some | some | none | all |
Doig + Smith | 9% | 69 | 40 days | 90 hours | GPP(C)/MP(NC) | 27% | 9% | 13 | all | all | none | some | all | all |
Donald Insall Associates | 11% | 83 | 25 days | 30 hours | CP(C) | 48% | 13% | 11 | all | all | some | none | all | all |
Elliott Wood | 18% | 123 | 30 days | 150 hours | DCSP(C)/ GPP(C+NC) | 14% | 8% | 11 | all | all | some | all | all | all |
Hardies | 10% | 78 | 40 days | 25 hours | PP(C) | 16% | 3% | 4 | some | all | none | all | none | none |
Henry Riley | 7% | 125 | 27 days | 40 hours | PP(C) | 16% | 11% | 9 | none | all | some | some | none | none |
Hilson Moran | 12% | 203 | 28 days | 49 hours | PP(C)/GPP(NC) | 15% | 16% | 5 | all | all | all | all | none | none |
HKS Architects | 6% | 71 | 30 days | 40 hours | GPP(C+NC) | 44% | 31% | 0 | all | all | all | some | none | none |
HLM | 11% | 172 | 33 days | 70 hours | PP(C)/GPP(C) | 40% | 12% | 22 | all | all | all | some | none | all |
HTA Design | 15% | 161 | 30 days | 25 hours | DCSP(C) | 44% | 13% | 16 | some | all | none | none | all | all |
Jestico + Whiles | 25% | 110 | 33 days | 24 hours | DCSP(C) | 46% | 8% | 11 | all | all | some | none | all | all |
John Rowan and Partners | 13% | 79 | 36 days | 22 hours | DCSP(C) | 12% | 23% | 12 | some | some | some | some | all | all |
JTP | 10% | 97 | 33 days | 23 hours | DCSP(C)/MP(C)/ PP(C)/GPP(C) | 51% | 19% | 5 | all | all | none | all | all | all |
Levitt Bernstein | 15% | 118 | 28 days | 46 hours | CP(C)/DCSP(C)/ MP(NC)/GPP(NC) | 40% | 7% | 5 | some | all | some | some | all | all |
Mace Limited | 21% | 3606 | 27 days | 12 hours | GPP(C) | 18% | 13% | 144 | all | all | all | all | all | all |
Make Architects | 8% | 145 | 30 days | 20 hours | DCSP(C)/GPP(NC) | 36% | 20% | 18 | all | all | all | all | all | all |
Martin Arnold | 15% | 72 | 25 days | 60 hours | PP(C) | 16% | 16% | 5 | none | all | none | all | all | all |
Max Fordham | 3% | 190 | 22 days | 65 hours | GPP(C) | 26% | 5% | 23 | all | all | all | none | all | all |
Method Consulting | 13% | 26 | 36 days | 45 hours | GPP(C) | 39% | 6% | 10 | some | all | none | all | some | some |
MSMR Architects | 7% | 33 | 30 days | 50 hours | GPP(C) | 48% | 12% | 3 | none | some | some | some | all | all |
Penoyre & Prasad | 9% | 43 | 28 days | 40 hours | DCSP(C)/PP(NC) | 49% | 24% | 4 | some | all | none | none | some | some |
Peter Brett Associates | 16% | 579 | 30 days | 47 hours | GPP(C) | 28% | 8% | 50 | all | all | all | some | all | all |
Phelan Construction | 5% | 110 | 25 days | 20 hours | DCSP(C) | 3% | 4% | 5 | some | all | none | all | all | all |
Pick Everard | 18% | 472 | 26 days | 35 hours | DCSP(C) | 21% | 22% | 11 | some | all | some | all | all | all |
Pollard Thomas Edwards | 20% | 129 | 28 days | 50 hours | PP(C)/GPP(NC) | 39% | 29% | 3 | all | all | none | some | all | all |
Prater | 12% | 354 | 30 days | 21 hours | CP(C)/DCSP/ MP(C) | 12% | 20% | 6 | some | all | none | some | none | none |
PRP | 15% | 233 | 30 days | 20 hours | PP(C) | 42% | 15% | 8 | some | all | none | some | all | all |
Ramboll UK | 18% | 768 | 30 days | 16 hours | DCSP(C) | 17% | 10% | 61 | some | all | some | all | some | some |
Ridge & Partners | 22% | 492 | 30 days | 31 hours | GPP(C) | 14% | 39 | all | all | some | all | all | none | |
RPA Group | 19% | 57 | 27 days | 30 hours | GPP(C) | 28% | 5% | 3 | all | all | some | all | all | all |
Scott Brownrigg | 16% | 262 | 32 days | 65 hours | PP(C) | 44% | 16% | 12 | some | all | some | all | some | all |
SCS Group | 10% | 44 | 25 days | 40 hours | GPP(C) | 15% | 9% | 5 | none | all | none | all | all | all |
Skanska UK | 13% | 5500 | 28 days | 17 hours | CP(C)/MP(C)/PP(C) | 21% | 23% | 235 | all | some | some | some | all | none |
Skelly & Couch | 9% | 33 | 27 days | 65 hours | PP(C) | 22% | 23% | 2 | some | all | some | all | all | all |
Troup Bywaters + Anders | 17% | 210 | 27 days | 70 hours | DCSP/PP(C) | 12% | 17% | 21 | all | all | none | all | all | all |
TUV SUD Wallace Whittle | 18% | 168 | 30 days | 224 hours | CP(C)/DCSP(C)/ PP(C)GPP(C) | 11% | 12 | all | all | some | some | all | all | |
WCEC Architects | 5% | 139 | 33 days | 41 hours | DCSP(C) | 15% | 11% | 2 | all | all | none | all | all | all |
Readers of 黑洞社区 that are eligible to enter 黑洞社区鈥檚 other 鈥淭op鈥 tables, such as consultants, contractors and housebuilders, and other industry firms were invited to take part in the selection process for the Good Employer Guide 2016, through a call for entries published in print and online. Each interested firm was sent a link to an online staff survey to send to all employees, which had to be filled in anonymously by a minimum of 33% of total staff, excluding those who work in purely support functions such as HR. This survey gauged strength of feeling on the company鈥檚 performance in nine key areas: leadership, corporate social responsibility, employees鈥 opportunity to contribute, working atmosphere, opportunities for smarter working, career progression, the company鈥檚 response to current market conditions, the promotion of mental wellbeing, and how likely staff would be to recommend their company to a new entrant to the industry. Survey responses were sent direct to 黑洞社区 magazine, and not seen by the company in question.
Separately, each interested firm was asked to complete an entry form giving the following information:
Companies were also asked to provide a 500-word statement in support of their entry, addressing the following areas: stand-out benefits; how the company has adapted to current market conditions; leadership and development; employee engagement; staff wellbeing and the 鈥渇eel good factor鈥; mental wellbeing; diversity and inclusion; corporate social responsibility, including attitude towards sustainability; and outreach to promote career opportunities in construction to new entrants.
The entries were assessed by a judging panel comprising: Michael Ryley, partner in Weightmans, Nicola Ihnatowicz, partner in Trowers & Hamlins, Rosalind Connor, partner in ARC Pensions Law, Sarah Richardson, editor of 黑洞社区 magazine, Chlo毛 McCulloch, managing editor of 黑洞社区 magazine, and Deborah Duke, production manager and special projects editor of 黑洞社区 magazine.
The top five firms were identified from a shortlist selected in the first judging round by a weighting system that rewarded firms for the benefits offered under the various entry headings and the strength of endorsement from staff gathered through responses to the survey. The weighting system was adjusted to take account of company demographics 鈥 for example, the size of the firm was taken into account when assessing the range of benefits offered, as was the sector in which the company worked. So, for example, a small regional contractor would not be penalised for not offering staff the opportunity to work abroad. The final top five were selected by amalgamating individual scores awarded to firms on this shortlist by each of our final round judges.
Beyond the top five, the firms selected for this year鈥檚 guide have been listed in alphabetical order. The guide contains the top 50 companies from the entries received. About 200 companies registered to be considered for the guide.
For enquiries about the entry process for the 2017 Guide, please email carolyn.leftly@ubm.com