Local authority | Original expected project completion date | Current expected project completion date | Major reasons for delay |
Bradford | Dec-07 | Sep-08 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes |
Bristol | Apr-08 | Jan-09 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes |
Greenwich | Apr-09 | Sep-11 | Piloting of non-standard BSF procurement model by local authority has been problematic and has caused considerable delay; Local resourcing difficulties; Issues around use of untested processes |
Knowsley | Sep-09 | Jan-10 | Issues around use of untested processes |
Leeds | Sep-10 | Sep-11 | Issues around use of untested processes |
Lewisham | Jul-10 | Sep-10 | Issues around use of untested processes |
Manchester | Sep-09 | Jun-11 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes; later project rescoping, including integrating seven new academies |
Newham | Jan-09 | Mar-11 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes; Local resourcing difficulties |
Sheffield | Mar-10 | Apr-11 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes |
Solihull | Sep-08 | Sep-09 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes |
STaG | Dec-12 | Jan-13 | Issues around use of untested processes |
Sunderland | Jan-10 | Sep-10 | Challenging original completion expectations; Issues around use of untested processes |