London Underground to bypass main contractors and take on more construction risk in 拢331m station programme

London Underground

London Underground will take on a much higher proportion of construction risk under its radical new approach to procuring work that will see it bypass main contractors.

Speaking to 黑洞社区 this week, Miles Ashley, programme director of Crossrail and stations at London Underground, said London Underground鈥檚 new approach, which involves bypassing tier one contractors and entering into direct relationships with trade contractors, will lead to the client taking on a much greater level of construction risk.

He said: 鈥淗istorically we have tended to contract in these long chains. The public sector tends towards these arrangements because it鈥檚 very low risk.

鈥淚f we are going to access better outcomes in terms of value, we are going to have to take more risk.鈥

Last month, m that will mean engaging directly with lower levels of the supply chain on its seven-year 拢331m station upgrade programme.

Three consortiums are in the running to form the client鈥檚 delivery partner for the new system, called Stake (see above).

Ashley said the delivery partner would run the 拢331m programme of works across 71 stations and assist London Underground with all its construction work. It will also help develop skills in construction management, construction planning and commercial management.

London Underground expects to achieve cost savings of at least 12% and up to 25% through the Stake system with contractors due to be appointed between September and the end of this year.

Ashley said he wanted to restore 鈥渁 sense of craftsmanship to the workplace鈥 and that contractors with tradespeople directly on their books would be at an advantage in bidding for work on the seven-year programme.  

鈥淭he question we are going to be asking is what people have you got? It鈥檚 going to favour people who can bring us that capability,鈥 he said.

鈥淚f we can get a capable, incentivised, engaged and consistent workforce at that [tradespeople] level and then build the rest of the system around that, then we can get a good result.鈥

Suzannah Nichol, chief executive of the National Specialist Contractors Council, said major clients were questioning the value they were getting from main contractors.

鈥淧eople are realising there鈥檚 much more to be got out of tier two and three contractors. If you appoint someone on price where鈥檚 their incentive to do things much better?鈥 she said.

But Graham Watts, chief executive of the Construction Industry Council, said only the small number of clients with a large enough construction workload to keep a construction management arm busy would find an advantage in such an approach.

鈥淚鈥檓 sure most of the major clients have been thinking along these lines for quite a while,鈥 he added.

Is this the end of the line for main contractors?

Miles Ashley, programme director of Crossrail and stations at London Underground, said main contractors would not be prohibited from winning work on the new 拢331m station upgrade programme, despite the new approach that favours tier two and three contractors. 鈥淚鈥檓 putting construction management capability in here [at London Underground] and engaging with tier two and three suppliers,鈥 he said.

鈥淚f a main contractor can come to me and demonstrate that it can add value in that matrix, then we鈥檒l talk. The model isn鈥檛 a fixed thing.鈥

But he did say main contractors would have a greater role on major projects, such as London Underground鈥檚 拢500m upgrade to Bank station,

Ashley said that on larger schemes he wanted to see more 鈥渋ntellectual input鈥 from bidders to 鈥渟olve our operational issues in imaginative ways鈥.