The University Hospitals of Leicestershire NHS trust has launched a 拢9m counter-claim against a John Laing-led consortium that is suing it for wasted bid costs on a cancelled project

The original High Court writ was filed in October by the Triskelion consortium, which comprises John Laing, Laing O鈥橰ourke, Serco and Portfolio Solutions (Northern Ireland). It is seeking 拢28m in bid costs and damages after the Leicester PFI hospital scheme, on which it was preferred bidder, was scrapped.

The consortium says a letter signed in March 2005 confirmed it would be paid for wasted bid costs 鈥渋n the event that an NHS PFI scheme which would otherwise have been viable is cancelled by the NHS鈥�.

But the NHS trust has retaliated with a counter-claim against three of the seven firms in the consortium, saying: 鈥淭he dominant reason for the failure of the project was the consortium鈥檚 unwillingness or inability to design a viable scheme following a government review of PFI hospital schemes.鈥�

It added: 鈥淭he trust鈥檚 invitation to negotiate included the provision that it reserved the right to cancel the tender process at any stage without explanation. Under no circumstances would the trust be liable for any costs or expenses borne by the candidates in this process.鈥�

The reason for the failure was the consortium鈥檚 inability to design a viable scheme Leicester NHS trust

The trust is claiming 拢7.1m plus interest from Portfolio Solutions and about 拢900,000 each plus interest from Laing Investments Management Services and Serco.

Triskelion said: 鈥淲e鈥檝e been attempting to resolve this issue for more than two years and have been left with no option but to seek redress through the courts.鈥�

The scheme, which was to consolidate healthcare in the region had a budget of 拢904m before the trust scaled it back and eventually cancelled it after a public review of PFI projects in January 2006.

Leicester NHS Trust declined to comment on its counter-claim.