黑洞社区

The Association for the Conservation of Energy has said it will press ahead with legal action against the government over its decision to scrap proposed changes to the building regulations that would have driven take-up of the Green Deal.

Communities secretary Eric Pickles announced in December that the government would not be pushing ahead with plans to introduce a 鈥渃onsequential improvement鈥� under Part L of the building regulations, which would have forced home owners to upgrade the energy performance of their buildings when making other significant improvements.

Pickles scrapped the proposals despite widespread industry support. According to the government鈥檚 own figures the new regulations would have given a boost to the government鈥檚 flagship Green Deal scheme, resulting in 2.2m more households taking it up.

The plans had been consulted on earlier in the year, but had sparked a media backlash after they were dubbed a 鈥渃onservatory tax鈥�.

ACE threatened to take Pickles鈥� decision to judicial review last month and following a belated response from the government, received last week, has now decided to press ahead with the action. It will file papers at the high court on Friday challenging the decision.

Andrew Warren, director of ACE, said Pickles鈥� decision to scrap the plans had been a 鈥渃omplete volte face鈥�. 鈥淲e want to see a speedy resolution of this matter, so that we can begin to see some of the benefits which Mr Pickles identified last year would accrue from implementing the 鈥榗onsequential improvements鈥� strategy, of 拢11bn of savings to the economy, 130m lifetime tonnes of carbon dioxide and 2.2m more households benefitting from the Green Deal,鈥� he said.

Warren also said that Pickles had conceded in his response to the ACE that his statement to parliament in December had contained inaccuracies. 鈥淭his included quoting completely inaccurate figures and drawing conclusions from the wrong focus groups,鈥� said Warren.

Asked to clarify what inaccuracies Pickles had made in his statement to parliament, the Department for Communities and Local Government declined to comment.

A spokeswoman said: 鈥淲e will be robustly contesting this legal challenge. We believe that consequential improvements would discourage many home owners from improving their home and, after careful consideration, we will not be imposing new regulations in this regard.鈥�