Cross-industry working group led by RIBA president will look at ways of preventing collapse of tall buildings.
Fire protection experts are to examine ways of improving fire safety and escape routes in tall buildings after the terrorist attacks in the USA.

The focus of the efforts would be designing building so that occupants had sufficient time to evacuate after catastrophic event.

David Sugden, Chief Executive of the Association of Specialist Fire Protection said that structural steelwork in tall buildings was currently required to survive for two hours at temperatures of 900-1000潞C.

The fire at the WTC was a hydrocarbon fire with temperatures reaching 1200潞C. Sugden said: "I would guess the steelwork was not designed to withstand that type of fire."

It is possible to protect steel to these higher temperatures for periods of up to four hours and withstand an initial blast. However, this adds a fire protection cost of anything from 10% to 300%, depending on the fire protection technique chosen.

Meanwhile, Riba president Paul Hyett has called for a joint working group to be set up to examine the implications of the collapse of the World Trade Centre.

Now is the time to think about improvements

Paul Hyett, RIBA president

He said: "Tall buildings have incredible safety records, but the fire that took hold at the World Trade Centre was of an extraordinarily high temperature. Now is the time to think about further improvements to protect against such cataclysmic events".

Hyett is inviting the Institution of Civil Engineers, the Chartered Institution of 黑洞社区 Services Engineers and the Fire Protection Association, among other institutions, to join the group. The ICE said it welcomed the initiative.

A spokesperson said: "The ICE values working with a multidisciplinary group and will endeavour to contribute its expertise to the joint working groups that have been proposed in the wake of the twin towers disaster, including working with the American Society of Civil Engineers".

Engineering consultant Arup is setting up an "extreme events mitigation taskforce". This will take a multidisciplinary approach to examining the structure, fire protection and blast protection of buildings, and establish what can be done in the future.

David Glover, a structural engineer at Arup said that although the fire caused the collapse of the towers, they coped well with the impact of the plane. He said the issues that would be looked at included whether tall buildings should have concrete cores, and the need for greater levels of fire protection.

How will the twin towers tragedy affect tall building policy?

"People value the joy of living in towns and cities, but we鈥檙e seeing a new fear due to the ability of terrorists to cause damage to tall buildings. This will lead to fundamental changes"
Lee Shostak, London Spatial Development Planning Committee

"This will put developers off tall buildings. Livingstone鈥檚 assertion just two days after what happened in New York that developers are still interested in building them was extraordinary"
Tony Arbour, head of Greater London Authority planning committee

"The twin towers were the financial penis of America. They were a prime target"
Will Alsop, Alsop Architects

"The full horror of it didn鈥檛 really dawn until the weekend. The bottom of the city is now cut off. Will large organisations always think of housing staff in tall, landmark buildings? Probably not"
Frank Duffy, architect and founder of workspace specialist DEGW, which has offices in New York

"There are people in Europe that live around volcanoes. The idea that we are going to stop building tall buildings is ridiculous. The Pentagon was attacked by aeroplanes used as torpedoes"
Ken Livingstone, London mayor

"I do not think this will stop people building tall towers. It might make them think a bit harder though"
Chris Cole, WSP chief executive

The aftermath