RICS will regulate its members with enhanced regulatory framework for valuation
RICS is to set in motion a global consultation to develop an enhanced regulatory framework for valuation that aims to raise professional standards, improve confidence for clients and help secure the accurate valuations that underpin most economic activity.
If approved, all members involved in the valuation of commercial and residential property and specialist areas such as rural property, plant and equipment, personal and business property along with mineral asset valuations will have their competence monitored on a continuing basis to satisfy clients, and public authorities that RICS is able to properly regulate its members in a testing environment.
It also proposes to introduce an accreditation scheme for RICS valuers which will provide a recognisable 鈥榢itemark鈥 covering the method and practice of valuations and require re-accreditation every three years.
Since 2002, RICS has been involved in an on-going process that led to major changes in its regulatory regime. From 2007 RICS has been operating a 'better regulation' model under arms-length governance.
Members voted to approve an independent recommendation of Sir Bryan Carsberg to introduce a system of proactive monitoring to check compliance with the Red Book (which is mandatory for all RICS members and regulated firms).
The organisation expects that the valuation framework will be mandatory for all RICS valuers who are subject to the RICS Red Book from April 2010.
Mark Gerold, RICS spokesman, said: 鈥淭he value of property is the key component which underpins economic activity. It is vital that there is an effectively regulated gold standard for valuation across the globe which inspires public confidence in the profession.
鈥淭he economic and social importance of all property assets can not be underestimated especially towards wealth generation in a functioning economy. The current financial turmoil highlights the need for raising standards to ensure a stabilising foundation for future economic development.鈥
No comments yet