黑洞社区

A plan to make licensing mandatory across the construction industry has been unveiled by the Federation of Master Builders.

An independent research report carried out by consultant Pye Tait which details the benefits of introducing a licensing scheme for the whole construction industry and puts forward a proposal for how it could work has been published by the FMB.

The report, Licence to build: A pathway to licensing UK construction, was officially launched at the House of Lords yesterday and aims to improve both the quality and reputation of the construction industry.

According to the FMB, almost 80% of builders and home owners are calling on the government to introduce a licensing scheme for the UK construction industry to stamp out rogue traders once and for all. 

Brian Berry, chief executive of the FMB, said: 鈥淭he vast majority of builders and home owners want to see the construction industry professionalised and it is time for the government to act. It鈥檚 unacceptable that more than half of consumers have had a negative experience with their builder.

鈥淗owever, we shouldn鈥檛 be surprised by this given that in the UK, it is perfectly legal for anyone to set up a building firm and start selling their services without any prior experience or qualifications.

鈥淭his cannot be right given the nature of the work and the potential health and safety risks when something goes wrong. In countries like Australia and Germany, building firms require a licence and we want to see the UK government regulate our industry in a similar manner.鈥�

The proposed plan would mean the introduction of a sector-wide licensing scheme, apply to all types and sizes of construction work conducted by a contractor. It would also apply to all legal entities of construction firm, incorporated, unincorporated and sole traders rather than individuals.

Berry concluded: 鈥淚n terms of how the scheme might work, it needn鈥檛 be too costly or bureaucratic. Our report draws on the experience of experts from across the construction industry and puts forward a clear proposal.

鈥淲e are suggesting that the scheme covers all paid-for construction work by firms of all sizes, not just those working in the domestic sector. Fees should be tiered and could start at as little as 拢150 every three to five years, with the largest contractors paying around 拢1,000 over the same period. In terms of how it鈥檚 governed, the licence should be administered by a single authority with a broad range of scheme providers sitting underneath.

鈥淲e are now keen to reach out to the whole construction sector to get their input on the proposal. If we can demonstrate broad support for this approach, we are optimistic that the Government will take it forward.鈥�

Berry said licensing could go a long way in improving the reputation of the industry and help promote construction as a career to the younger generation.

鈥淔or too long, the very worst construction firms, most of which undertake private domestic work, have been giving the whole sector a bad name. So that鈥檚 why this scheme should be of interest to the whole sector and not just small local builders,鈥� he said.