黑洞社区

New national contracts should be set up for school building projects, according to Sebastian James鈥� long awaited review of the school building programme, published today.

The review, which has been delayed since December, makes sixteen recommendations for the future of schools procurement.

Among these are, as reported in 黑洞社区 two weeks ago, that a central body should be responsible for procurement of major projects. The review states that this central body 鈥渟hould put in place a small number of new national procurement contracts that will drive quality and value from the programme ahead.鈥�

The review also states that the government should:

• Revise and simplify school premises regulations
• Reduce bureaucracy around BREEAM assessments
• Promote standardised design
• Carry out independent building condition surveys on a rolling 20% sample of the estate.
• Have a single funding stream for schools capital for each area, but have a centrally retained budget for free schools

In a letter to education secretary Michael Gove accompanying the findings, Sebastian James said: 鈥淧utting my recommendations into practice will be a major challenge. I know that I am asking for a significant change in culture and practice. Getting the right structures in place to deliver at national and local level will be vital. I anticipate that, for some stakeholders in the process, there will be parts of my suggested approach that may be less palatable than others and that there will need to be some give-and-take.鈥�

The government will now have to respond to the recommendations, in a process which is estimated to take around a month.

A spokesperson for delivery agency Partnerships for Schools said: 鈥淎 spokesperson for PfS said: 鈥淲e have worked closely with the review team and the Department for Education to share our expertise and knowledge throughout the review period. We welcome today鈥檚 publication and will look at the recommendations with interest.鈥�