A report by the district auditor slammed the management team and criticised the overspend. The project cost has risen from 拢15m to almost 拢25m.
The project has run into problems on site and it is understood that contractor Gleeson is considering legal action over claims.
Hodder Associates principal partner Stephen Hodder admitted that there were difficulties but insisted that the auditor鈥檚 figures were incorrect. He said: 鈥淭he contract figure and the overspend figure put out by the district auditor do not add up.鈥� However, he declined to put a figure on the scheme鈥檚 overspend. He added: 鈥淲ith a potential claim from Gleeson, we are not in a position to go into the precise costs involved.鈥�
Hodder said: 鈥淭he project was tendered along with a raft of millennium projects. At the time, contractors were very busy and tenders exceeded predictions.鈥�
He added: 鈥淭he problems after work began lay largely with the fairfaced concrete. There was a redesign of the concrete that was poured while on site, and we were also pouring concrete at the wrong time of year.鈥�
However, a project source said the main reason for the delay and overspend was problems installing the centre鈥檚 complex roof.
The source said: 鈥淭he steelwork for the roof involved two or three costly redesigns while it was on site. The steelwork was a challenge because it is quite unique. Achieving the correct finish on the concrete was difficult. The concrete had to be given additional coats, and that added to the delays.鈥�
Gleeson refused to comment on the project overspend but a spokesperson said it had been granted more time to finish the project. 鈥淭he completion date has been extended to June 2000,鈥� the spokesperson said.
The district auditor criticised Hackney council for poor management. Its report said: 鈥淪ufficient corporate emphasis was not placed on ensuring that the project was being properly managed.鈥�
The council has attacked the district auditor for releasing the report. A spokesperson said:
鈥淭he district auditor has broken the rules in releasing these figures. Essentially, this is a contractual matter.鈥� He added: 鈥淭he council is investigating reasons for the overspend. It should be remembered that the Clissold Leisure Centre is an ambitious project of a complex design.鈥� The auditor鈥檚 report said: 鈥淭he Clissold Leisure Centre scheme is projected to overspend by 拢10.6m.鈥�
