Squibb one of 10 companies named by CMA in June
One of the two demolition firms contesting claims made by the Competition and Markets Authority that it was involved in bid-rigging and making 鈥榗ompensation payments鈥� has posted an improved turnover in its latest set of accounts.
Essex firm Squibb Group has not admitted wrongdoing and is contesting the provisional findings that were announced over the summer.
In a statement at the time, it said: 鈥淪quibb Group Limited will continue to engage with the CMA regarding its assessment of the facts relating to Squibb and the market for demolition services.
鈥淚n accordance with the process, the CMA is required to consider Squibb鈥檚 representations before finalising its decision. We have a high degree of confidence that the CMA will take Squibb鈥檚 submissions/concerns seriously.鈥�
In its latest set of accounts filed at Companies House, Squibb saw turnover rise 5% to 拢32.9m in the year to January 2022. Income at its demolition business rose 6.5% to 拢31m.
The CMA鈥檚 own guidance says it has the power to fine firms up to 10% of their global turnover, with the deadline to pay penalties specified when its 鈥渋nfringement鈥� decision is issued.
It usually asks firms to pay up within three months but it does have mechanisms to allow them more time to settle.
Squibb鈥檚 pre-tax profit during the period fell from 拢1.6m to just under 拢275,000. The firm said it was hit with 拢600,000 of exceptional items, including 拢100,000 of covid costs and a further 拢500,000 set aside for contract settlements and adjudications.
It added that its pricing had been impacted by the war in Ukraine and that it had 鈥渓imited ability鈥� to pass on price rises to customers on jobs 鈥減riced in late 2021 for 2022 delivery鈥�. But it said jobs priced since this summer 鈥渉ave taken into account the current prices for fuel and raw materials鈥� [and] we will seek to pass on as much of the input cost price inflation to our customers鈥�.
Squibb did not mention the CMA probe by name but said in the accounts it was 鈥渟ubject to an ongoing regulatory investigation. At this time, the outcome is considered to be indeterminable.鈥�
In June, the CMA鈥檚 senior director of cartels Juliette Enser told 黑洞社区 that Squibb and Erith, the other firm contesting the findings, had the chance to make 鈥榬epresentations鈥� to its case decision group which will decide on their merit. 鈥淧arties who wish to challenge can also do so through the courts,鈥� she added.
The CMA is expected to publish its definitive findings next month by which time a decision on Squibb鈥檚 and Erith鈥檚 claims will be made along with the level of fines set to be doled out to firms. Eight of the 10 named in the summer have already admitted their involvement.
What demolition firms have said
Keltbray
鈥淜别濒迟产谤补测 strongly condemns anti-competitive practices and, having co-operated fully and formally settled its case with the CMA, acknowledges the findings relating to isolated activities of a previous management team in a subsidiary business.
鈥淎s the CMA investigation has confirmed, Keltbray Limited did not benefit from the award of any contracts nor received any compensation payments arising from this infringement activity.
Since 2019 Keltbray has transformed its organisational structure and corporate governance framework and has assured all stakeholders that these historic practices will not occur in the future.鈥�
Brown and Mason
鈥�Brown and Mason continues to cooperate fully with the CMA鈥檚 investigation into allegations of anticompetitive behaviour in the UK demolition sector.
鈥淚n order to draw a line under this, Brown and Mason have agreed to settle in relation to two historic, unconnected and isolated instances that took place under previous management nearly a decade ago. No customers were adversely affected by Brown and Mason鈥檚 conduct and we remain committed to delivering the highest possible level of technical, commercial and ethical service to our customers.
鈥淐ompetition law compliance is at the core of our business, with our new, progressive management team having taken extensive and appropriate steps to reinforce our competition law compliance measures.鈥�
John F Hunt
鈥�John F Hunt acknowledges and accepts the findings of the CMA investigation which has provisionally found that John F Hunt was involved in breaches of competition law in relation to a small number of historic and unrelated bids.
鈥淲e note the CMA鈥檚 acknowledgement that John F Hunt was not involved in any compensation arrangements relating to those bids. John F Hunt also did not benefit from the award of any of the relevant contracts.
鈥淭he Group has fully cooperated with the CMA鈥檚 investigation and is fully committed to compliance with competition law. We have strengthened our competition law compliance measures and do not condone any activity which limits or restricts competition in the market.鈥�
McGee
鈥�McGee acknowledges historic Competition Act infringements as announced by the CMA. These infringements took place under the previous ownership and leadership structure.
鈥淭hroughout the period of the investigation, McGee has co-operated fully with the CMA. Having reached a final settlement position, McGee has certainty over the quantum of its fine and has made full provision in its previous audited financial statements. Accordingly, there will be no further financial impact on McGee arising from the investigation.鈥�
Cantillon
鈥淭oday the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced the findings of its investigation into anti-competitive behaviour during the period of 2009-2019. This found that Cantillon was one of a number of demolition companies that engaged in this behaviour, with instances from 2013-2017. We have worked closely with the CMA on this civil investigation by cooperating fully, and do not dispute the findings.
鈥淐antillon has a proud record stretching back over 50 years. This culture informed our decision to proactively end these practices back in 2017 and reform our internal governance and cultural approach to prevent them from reoccurring. The Cantillon of 2022 is a very different business to that of 2017. We have accepted the fine and apologise to our customers and stakeholders for our previous lapse in standards.鈥�
TE Scudder/Careys
鈥淭oday, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a press release regarding investigations into suspected anti-competitive arrangements in the supply of demolition construction services in Great Britain.
鈥淭.E. Scudder Limited has been listed as an involved party and as a leniency applicant. In line with the CMA鈥檚 usual practice, it has automatically held T.E Scudder Limited鈥檚 parent companies, P.J. Carey Plant Hire (Oval) Limited and Carey Group Limited liable as well. We want to take this opportunity to sincerely apologise for the actions that resulted in this investigation. The behaviours that were exhibited were not acceptable and are certainly not in line with our values.鈥�
Erith, DSM and Clifford Devlin were all contacted for comment
No comments yet