Haworth Tompkins鈥� planning application for five new blocks at listed London estate pulled after resident revolt

Trellick Tower

The scheme would have seen five new blocks built on a site surrounding the grade II*-listed Trellick tower in North-west London

Kensington and Chelsea council has withdrawn its controversial plans to redevelop the estate surrounding the grade II*-listed Trellick tower following a rowdy meeting between councillors and residents.

The Haworth Tompkins-designed proposals would have seen five additional blocks built on the Cheltenham Estate, including a podium at the base of Erno Goldfinger鈥檚 1970s tower.

But campaign group Save Trellick said the new blocks would have 鈥渆ffectively cut the Cheltenham Estate in two, dividing a vibrant and diverse community, and undermining the architectural setting of the site鈥�.

More than 3,000 residents of the estate signed a petition urging councillors to rethink the plans, while a similar number supported a second petition backed by the Twentieth Century Society.

Save Trellick said tensions 鈥渂oiled over鈥� earlier this month at a meeting of the council as housing chief Kim Taylor-Smith faced questions from residents and councillors about the scheme.

The group said Taylor-Smith 鈥渉ad to fight to be heard over the outrage of angry residents sitting in the public gallery鈥�.

In a video tweeted by the council last week, Taylor-Smith said he had made the decision to 鈥減ause鈥� the redevelopment following 鈥渞ecent conversations we鈥檝e had with residents鈥�.

He added: 鈥淟et me be clear, we鈥檙e still going to build homes on this site鈥� but I don鈥檛 want to force things through against residents鈥� wishes.

鈥淎nd with that in mind I鈥檝e asked planning officers to withdraw the application and we will engage with the community again to see what might work and what our options are.

鈥淎ll of us need the Christmas and New Year break to reflect, so we can come back and talk to residents in the New Year.鈥�

Save Trellick also claimed the council had tried to 鈥渂ypass democratic procedures鈥� by handing the application to junior civil servants rather than councillors on the planning committee.

The council said this was 鈥渃ategorically untrue鈥�, adding: 鈥淭his was a major planning application that was scheduled to go to a full committee hearing in March before it was withdrawn.

鈥淭hat would have meant it being discussed, debated and voted on in an open committee.鈥�

Trellick tower was granted its listed status in 1998, while the wider Cheltenham Estate, which includes the low-rise Edenham Way buildings, was listed in 2012.

Topics