Hackney council鈥檚 troubled leisure centre suffers further delays, as total cost heads towards 拢37m
Clissold Leisure Centre in north London will not reopen until February 2006 and the total cost of building and repairing it could be more than 拢37m, Hackney council has revealed.
At a council meeting on Monday, councillors agreed to set aside an extra 拢5.1m for repair works to be carried out on the leisure centre, which has been shut since last December.
The repair costs would bring the total cost of the centre to 拢37.1m, 拢15m more than planned. Moreover, the re-opening date will be almost four years after the centre first opened 鈥� two and a half years late 鈥� in March 2002.
The decision to provide the extra money follows a report by architect Bickerdike Allen and engineer Arup, which determined what had gone wrong on the project and how it should be put right. The council insists the figure of 拢37m constitutes a 鈥渨orst-case scenario鈥�.
The report assembled evidence of alleged design faults that will form the basis of the council鈥檚 second round of litigation, in which Hackney is claiming damages from architect Hodder Associates, engineer Whitbybird and contractor Gleeson.
The first court action, which concerned time and cost overruns, also involved Hodder Associates and quantity surveyor Davis Langdon. It was settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
Jules Pipe, mayor of Hackney, said the final amount that the council would have to pay would be much less than 拢37m because it had received money from the first round of litigation.
He said: 鈥淚t鈥檒l basically be a 拢22m leisure centre, which will cost somewhere under 拢30m.
鈥淚f the tests to the roof show that it does not need to be replaced, the 拢5.1m bill for repairs could also be considerably lower.鈥�
Designs for the repairs will be drawn up by Bickerdike Allen and Arup. Contractors will be procured using a restricted process with no more than five firms putting in tenders.
Pipe also gave an insight into the catalogue of problems that Hackney confronted at the leisure centre. These included rusting hinges and doors to 鈥渨et鈥� areas made from the wrong wood. The council did not know if these failings were because of design or specification problems.
He added that the same confusion surrounded the structural leaking at the centre, as the council did not know if this was due to a fault in the roof, condensation, or problems with the M&E.
Pipe said that the final straw came with the 鈥渃atastrophic鈥� failure of the pumping system, which caused a large volume of water to empty into the plant room.
In the council meeting, Labour councillor James Cannon called for more accountability in the way the council handled the project.
He said: 鈥淚 believe it鈥檚 absolutely critical to have a named officer to carry the can. One lesson we should take is that the public has been very frustrated that nobody has stood up to say 鈥業 made a cock-up on this鈥�.鈥�
A council spokesperson said that a project manager with procurement and finance expertise would be appointed to oversee the repairs.
No comments yet