All Letters articles – Page 81

  • Comment

    The right mix

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    Your interview with the energy minister Malcolm Wicks (28 October) reinforced the view that we should move away from much of the current media debate on which energy source is “best” – a debate somewhat hijacked by nuclear energy.

  • Comment

    Mining other rich seams

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    I am writing in reponse to Malcolm Taylor’s etter on the Woodhorn Colliery in Northumberland (9 September).

  • Comment

    Mall mauling

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    I am compelled to comment on the latest addition to the infamous Arndale Centre by Chapman Taylor (21 October).

  • Comment

    The lesson of Leeds

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    Your lead story on the CASPAR housing scheme in Leeds (28 October) illustrates perfectly the folly of the prescriptive approach to specifying how houses and flats should be built.

  • Comment

    It’s too late to be reasonable

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    You are absolutely right that “if construction is to deliver, it needs the rules spilling out of Whitehall to follow the three Cs: they must be clear, concise and consistent” (leader).

  • Comment

    Help for Gus

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    Of course the answer to Gus Alexander’s problem with the lowest price tender (28 October) would be for the client to employ a quantity surveyor at the outset of the project.

  • Comment

    L’s grannies

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    Images of little old ladies controlling their central heating by getting to grips with chapter 11 of the CIBSE Energy Efficiency Guide have faded away.

  • Comment

    More fuel to the fire

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    I read with interest the features on energy in this week’s issue. Of particular interest was the article “Homeowners want cheaper bills not greener measures” (page 23).

  • Comment

    Why the long face?

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    Was I the only one cheered up by all your dire warnings of a future without hydrocarbons, uranium, cars and so on?

  • Comment

    Bring on the Euro-directive

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    We are delighted that you devoted a whole publication to “the energy issue”.

  • Man on a crane with no harness equipment
    Comment

    Can we have our ball back?

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    This photo was taken in Cannes two years ago.

  • Comment

    An economic argument

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    You are trying to have it both ways: our industry moaning about energy price rises while pressing the government to make us more “sustainable”.

  • Comment

    After the endgame

    2005-11-11T00:00:00Z

    In the leader column in today’s issue of ڶ (28 October) you say: “Without a doubt energy is the most important problem we face as an industry and a society.” None of your readers, unless they had some kind of axe to grind, could disagree with the points you make. ...

  • Comment

    The race still running

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    Your article “Four housebuilders pull out of ‘onerous’ grant process” (28 October, page 22) took a somewhat sensational line and missed at least some of the point as a result. Opening bidding to private developers for the first time was always going to be about testing the market. We expected ...

  • A bad example of ladder craft.
    Comment

    Tales from the pit

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    Our thanks to George Fordyce, head of engineering policy at the National Home ڶ Council, for sharing this fine example of ladder craft.

  • Comment

    Hold your horses

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    It was interesting to note Christopher Linnett’s comments on the increasingly short periods of time being allowed for contractors to tender for design-and-build enquiries (14 October).

  • Comment

    Credit control where it’s due

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    Colin Harding and fellow travellers should remember one important fact before attempting to have retentions outlawed: contractors usually get paid 95% or 97% of work done to date in advance of completion, once a month.

  • Comment

    The rise and rise of consultation

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    Jon Rouse sensibly sees the pursuit of consensus through interminable consultation as a failure of nerve among those politically or professionally charged with planning (30 September). This serves as an apology from the man who established the corrosive influence of the unelected CABE.

  • Comment

    Completion equals confidence

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    Congratulations to Trevor Hursthouse for defending the indefensible – that is, retentions – (7 October) but I suppose as chairman of the Specialist Engineering Contractors’ Group he had no alternative.

  • Comment

    If you can’t stand the heat …

    2005-11-04T00:00:00Z

    Perhaps, as Mr Linnett considers it bad practice to tender within such periods, he should stop working in the hot kitchen and retire to the dining room immediately.As a front-line contractor’s estimator, I’m the first to agree that a contractor’s bid team is up against it when undertaking such a ...