All Legal articles 鈥� Page 92
-
CommentMultiple choice gives no answers
Raising one issue at a time in serial adjudications can lead to confusion all round - everything should be decided together
-
CommentBlown out of all proportion
The OFT sent a message to the industry by enforcing huge fines over cover pricing. A simple warning would have been enough
-
CommentClass action against blacklisting
A class action against Sir Robert McAlpine has cast a new spotlight on blacklisting that could mean a spate of similar claims - but winning these cases remains hindered by limited regulations
-
CommentLetters of intent: Don鈥檛 stick to the letter
A case involving Turner & Townsend shows, once again, that letters of intent are no substitute for an actual contract
-
CommentLetters of intent: I demand to see the manager
What happens if a client can鈥檛 make a claim against its contractor because the contract was signed too late? Well in this case, it鈥檚 the project manager who gets it in the neck instead
-
CommentScottish law: Beware the prickly thistle
Scottish law isn鈥檛 just about a distinctive approach to assessing extensions of time. There are a number of other differences
-
CommentPublic procurement: Time is not on your side
Procurement law has no place for those who patently miss time limits - the key is to make your claim quickly
-
CommentUK Guarantees: how you can get support
The UK Guarantees scheme has been open since July. How can you make sure you get support from the programme?
-
CommentChain full of weak links
Has Sir John Egan鈥檚 supply chain management agenda improved the industry? The winner of the JCT student essay competition thinks not
-
CommentForeign workers: Be a responsible boss
Foreign workers make up an important part of the construction workforce, but there are strict rules employers need to abide by
-
CommentCould Article 8 impact on evicting squatters?
The appeal of the recent Grow Heathrow case could create an extra hurdle for developers to overcome when recovering possession of land
-
NewsGalliford Try sues two firms for 拢3.8m
Contractor attempts to claw back costs of subsidence on 拢16.5m Orford Park leisure centre
-
CommentHow fair is the HSE's recovery scheme?
The HSE needs to convince the industry that its new cost recovery scheme is a deterrent against health and safety breaches and not just a method of lining its own pockets
-
CommentBeck vs UK Flooring: The right to remain silent
A recent case raises the question, how long must a letter of complaint stay unanswered before a dispute is inferred?
-
CommentBeck vs UK Flooring: Severing a decision
This recent case clears up uncertainty over whether courts are willing to enforce parts of an adjudicator鈥檚 decision while severing others
-
CommentProject bank accounts: Answering some myths
With the use of project bank accounts on the increase, it鈥檚 time to knock some misconceptions on the head
-
CommentSolar panels: Legal considerations
Installing solar PV panels is an attractive option for developers, but there are a number of issues to look out for
-
CommentWalter Lilly vs Mackay: A question of timing
A recent judgment has ended once and for all the long-running debate over who takes a hit when both parties in a contract have contributed to delays
-
CommentCould we just add a staircase here, perhaps?
The Giles Mackay case shows the folly of using a lump-sum contract on a project where the amateur client, inspired by House & Garden, wants a hand in the design鈥�
-
CommentBIM and PPC2000: In top form
As BIM embeds itself deeper in the construction industry, contracts that facilitate collaboration in the project team are becoming vital. PPC2000 is one of these鈥�