Legal views 鈥� Page 105
-
CommentOne-star review
The DTI has unveiled its proposals to amend the Construction Act. But if the government wants to stop payment abuses, it's not really going about it the right way
-
CommentJust don't do it
Adjudicators who try to dig up supporting evidence where it is lacking are committing a grave error - and playing into the hands of their detractors
-
-
CommentMr Jackson's justice
Up until now, PFI contracts have contained clauses intended to separate contractors from their statutory rights. This is not lawful
-
Comment
Not bad, not biased and not barking
Depending on who you ask, the new NEC contract displays favouritism to contractors or employers. In fact, it is the lawyers who amend it who are causing the problems
-
CommentBosses beware
his year is going to be packed with changes to employment law. This is what you need to know on age discrimination, illegal workers, TUPE and more 鈥�
-
CommentA night to regret
What happened to my mate Trevor after the Christmas party? He seemed so chatty, so relaxed. And a few hours later he was banged up in a police cell 鈥�
-
Comment
Studying the form
This year the JCT caused quite a stir when it decided to revamp its entire suite of contracts (see 黑洞社区, 24 June), but it鈥檚 the changes to the design contracts 鈥� Design and Build Contract and the Intermediate Contract with Design 鈥� that have created most interest.
-
CommentEasy money
Loopholes in the NEC鈥檚 target contract mean contractors can use their old tricks to make a profit rather than taking a share of any project savings 鈥�
-
CommentA painful case
Sometimes contractors just get fed up with a job, and it grinds to a halt. When something like that happened to Birse, it got sacked. Then it got the bill 鈥�
-
CommentListen, this is important
Delay analysis is too pivotal to disputes to remain shrouded in mystery or to be left to the experts. Here鈥檚 what you must understand about the four main techniques 鈥�
-
Comment
Sort out your papers
The laws on illegal workers are set to get tougher, so make sure your procedures are watertight now
-
CommentYou鈥檙e mistaken, m鈥檒ud
In Carillion vs Devonport, the Court of Appeal was right to back an adjudicator鈥檚 decision to award interest, but in doing so it made some unhelpful comments 鈥�
-
CommentPeople who care
A faulty load transfer platform caused a block of luxury flats to sink. The consulting engineer didn鈥檛 design the platform, but could it be liable for the problem?
-
CommentDangerous liaisons
This week we have two industry reports that reveal contractors鈥� cavalier attitude to risk, starting with what industry executives will do to secure work 鈥�
-
CommentI鈥檓 feeling a bit fuzzy
Fuzzy-edge disease鈥� strikes when a contract does not clearly allocate design responsibilities. Emcor Drake & Scull tried to inoculate itself, but it got caught out
-
CommentEvents, dear boy
New rules on compensation events in the third edition of the New Engineering Contract mean it is fraught with difficulties for the unwary employer
-
-
CommentDrop the dead duck
A collapsed roof at a superstore started a chain of events that demonstrates the foolishness of risking indemnity costs when a claim looks certain to fail
-
CommentBehind the veil
This is a murky tale of one man, three companies and a lot of fly-tipping. It also illustrates how the courts will look at who truly controls a company 鈥�