黑洞社区

INTRODUCTION

Over recent months there has been a widespread conversation about the fire performance, combustibility and non-combustibility of products, specifically around the substantive components that make up the facades of high-rise and high-risk buildings 鈥� these substantive components being recognised as both the cladding (decorative, weather-resistant material) and insulation.

This CPD will look at what the industry needs to understand about a product鈥檚 combustibility rating and how clients, designers and contractors can best achieve what is described in the Hackitt review as the 鈥渓ower-risk鈥� option in facades.

Defining the fire safety performance of materials

While stressing a duty of responsibility, Dame Judith Hackitt said: 鈥淚n relation to the testing of cladding materials, there is currently a choice between using products of limited combustibility or undergoing a full system test. Using products which are non-combustible or of limited combustibility is undoubtedly the lower risk option.鈥�

Approved Document B (ADB) provides guidance regarding fire safety measures required in buildings and the influence of those on the choice of materials used when constructing a building.

A prime example would be the choice of insulation to be incorporated into buildings over 18m high, for example apartment developments.

Section B4 of the 黑洞社区 Regulations requires the external walls of a building to 鈥渁dequately resist the spread of fire鈥�, with further practical guidance given in ADB. Specific guidance is given in ADB in relation to the cladding and insulation materials used on buildings above 18m tall. 

At present, the potential ambiguity of ADB is the subject of much discussion 鈥� in particular, the guidance provided in section 12 relating to the fire resistance of external walls. However, there is clarity in respect of the fire safety of high-rise building facades, which is provided in section 12.5: 鈥淭he external envelope of a building should not provide a medium for fire spread if it is likely to be a risk to health or safety. The use of combustible materials in the cladding system and extensive cavities may present such a risk in tall buildings.鈥�

This guidance was echoed in the Department for Communities and Local Government 鈥� now the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government 鈥� 鈥淎dvice for 黑洞社区 Owners鈥�, section 8, paragraph 3 (August 2017): 鈥淎n obvious option to ensure that the cladding system adequately resists external fire spread, is to replace the system with one where all of the elements of the wall are of limited combustibility. For example, a wall system which includes an ACM panel with limited combustibility filler (category 1) and limited combustibility insulation such as stone wool.鈥�

In order to understand this guidance, it is necessary to understand how the terms 鈥渘on-combustible鈥�, 鈥渓imited combustibility鈥� and 鈥渃ombustible鈥� are defined.

Euroclass classifications

Euroclass	Definition	Example materials
A1	Non-combustible	Stone wool, glass wool, concrete, bricks
A2	Limited combustibility	Some A1 materials with organic facings
B	Combustible	Some phenolic foams
C	Combustible	Phenolic, some polyisocyanurate (PIR)
D	Combustible	PIR
E	Combustible	Flame-retarded expanded polystyrene (EPS)/extruded polystyrene (XPS), polyurethane (PUR)
F	Combustible	PUR
No performance determined (NPD)	Combustible

The Euroclass system

The Euroclass system is the harmonised European method of classifying the reaction to fire properties of construction products, providing a clear and simple method for comparing their performance when exposed to fire. Declaring a Euroclass rating is mandatory for all for CE-marked construction products. 

To be classified according to the Euroclass system, products must undergo testing for a range of factors in accordance with BS EN 13501-1:2007+A1:2009: Fire classification of construction products and building elements, part 1 鈥� classification using data from reaction to fire tests.

EN 13501-1 looks at results from the following 鈥渞eaction to fire鈥� (RtF) characteristics, covering: 

• Ignitability 
• Flame spread
• Heat release 
• Smoke production 
• Propensity for producing flaming droplets/particles. 

However, a product鈥檚 toxicity is not assessed, only the amount of smoke produced. 

The Euroclass system is accepted by all EU member states and is compulsory for products where there is a harmonised product standard. The rating system has seven classification levels: A1, A2, B, C, D, E and F, plus one rating 鈥渘o performance determined鈥� (NPD), that sits alongside but outside these ratings. Understanding these Euroclass classifications is vitally important. 

ADB defines products achieving an A1 classification as non-combustible and products achieving an A2 classification as being of limited combustibility. A-class products 鈥� those classified A1 and A2 鈥� make no significant contribution to fire growth. Products achieving a rating of B-F are are classified as combustible. 

鈥淣on-combustible鈥� is a legally defined term within the UK regulatory system. Other terms typically used by the industry to describe product performance, such as fire-safe, fireproof, fire-retardant or flameproof do not necessarily define that the product is non-combustible. 

If the insulation materials used on buildings taller than 18m are not 鈥渕aterials of limited combustibility or better鈥� eg Euroclass A1 or A2, then the specified wall construction needs to meet the requirements of BR135: Fire performance of external insulation for walls of multistorey buildings. This requires the exact construction to be tested in accordance with BS 8414 part 1 or 2. The facade must be installed exactly as set out in the test.

However, expert witnesses to the Grenfell Tower inquiry and other fire experts have cast doubt on whether BS 8414 is a suitable means of determining the fire safety of cladding systems.

In contrast, using A1 and A2 cladding and insulation materials, often referred to as the 鈥渓inear route鈥�, is a straightforward method of complying with the 黑洞社区 Regulations鈥� requirements for buildings of more than 18m in height. It is a commonsense approach to fire safety which, when undertaken correctly, severely limits the opportunity for fire to spread across the face of a building.

How to find out a product鈥檚 reaction to fire characteristics

Manufacturers of CE-marked construction products in the UK are legally required to have their products independently tested to verify performance claims and declare a reaction to fire rating. 

These results can be found in the product鈥檚 鈥渄eclaration of performance鈥� (DoP) certificate. Responsible manufacturers will make these declarations easily and readily available.

The DoP is a legal document in which the manufacturer identifies the product and its intended use, indicating compliance in relation to the relevant harmonised product standard and performance in relation to specified 鈥渆ssential characteristics鈥�, including fire.

In the case of thermal insulation, all products should be CE-marked against the appropriate harmonised standard. The harmonised product standard for mineral wool is BS EN 13162:2012 +A1:2015. 

The Hackitt review recommends that for new-builds, a building information modelling (BIM) approach should be phased in: 鈥淎 BIM system will enable the dutyholder to ensure accuracy and quality of design and construction, which are crucial for building in safety up front.鈥� 

Clients, principal designers, principal contractors and building owners/landlords will each be required to fulfil the role of dutyholder (whether at individual or organisational level) and will each be assigned specific responsibilities at different phases of the building life cycle. 

Each dutyholder will hand over to the next, maintaining what is known as the 鈥済olden thread鈥�, which will ensure the building is procured, designed, constructed, operated and maintained in such a way that the key building safety requirements of the 黑洞社区 Regulations are sufficiently prioritised throughout.

BIM models can be used as a straightforward route for architects to identify not only the thermal and acoustic performance of insulation products but also their fire safety performance. BIM modelling allows for appropriate products and materials to then be incorporated into the design of the building. Responsible manufacturers will include the Euroclass ratings in BIM objects, and links should be available to the DoP. 

What is a Class 0 rating?

Class 0 is a product performance classification defined in ADB, which is limited to assessing the 鈥渟pread of flame鈥� characteristics over the surface of a material derived when it is tested in accordance with BS 476 parts 6 and 7. The limited scope of a Class 0 rating is in marked contrast to the Euroclass system, which assesses combustibility (and, importantly, whether a material is non-combustible), ignitability, flame spread, calorific value and the development of smoke and burning droplets.

The fact that construction products achieving only the poorest Euroclass rating of F can be rated Class 0 also demonstrates what an ineffective measure this is. A Class 0 rating by itself should therefore not be taken as providing reassurance about a product鈥檚 fire performance, much less that it signifies that a product is non-combustible or a close equivalent. 

Hackitt argued in her report that stakeholders needed to 鈥渂egin thinking about buildings as a system, so that we can consider the different layers of protection that may be required to make [a particular] building safe鈥�.

Our focus on safety should remain throughout the lifetime of a building. This would align with the use of BIM modelling for capturing product characteristics and specifying materials as identified above.  

It also means that we should consider all materials used in the construction of a building, not just the facade. For example, on flat roofs, high-density roofing boards made from non-combustible stone wool (see box) can be used as part of a single-ply or high-performance built-up roofing system; high-density boards of materials can provide high levels of thermal and acoustic insulation. This type of product can be fixed directly to a metal roof deck.

In conclusion, everything should be done to encourage those involved in the design, construction and subsequent maintenance of a building to use non-combustible materials.