We鈥檙e up in the social stratosphere this week: dress sense at the Lords, Canary Wharf Group鈥檚 plans for the great unwashed, and One Hyde Park鈥檚 elusive residents - only high jinks at the Shard lower the tone
No comment
I felt sorry for Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners this week because I understand not one of the residents of One Hyde Park was available to talk to the RIBA London Awards judging panel on its visit. Obviously, it鈥檚 going to be difficult for the jet-setting super-rich residents of the scheme to find time in their diaries even if they happen to be in London but you鈥檇 have hoped that one of them could have taken a few minutes to help the bid get some recognition. I鈥檓 sorry to say, I don鈥檛 fancy RSHP鈥檚 chances this year.
Ties that bind
I fear Hafren Power, the firm developing a fresh Severn Barrage scheme, is not taking the right tack as it tries to build support in Westminster. This week several Lords criticised the scheme during a debate. Lord Berkeley, for one, said it was 鈥渁bsurdly short on detail鈥. But Baroness Verma, under-secretary of state, Department of Energy and Climate Change, showed that impressing her could be done in simpler ways, noting that 鈥淟ord Cope, who introduced the debate today, has, through the tie that he is wearing, educated me a little further on the importance of knowing about Bristol port and its history. The tie illustrates the ship, The Matthew, which in 1497 sailed from Bristol port and discovered America.鈥 Hafren Power, should get down to Savile Row and make an investment.
Culture and anarchy
Canary Wharf Group is rather ambitiously trying to recreate Shoreditch on a site next to its financial services fiefdom in the Docklands area of east London. The developer鈥檚 project design executive Stephen Andrews gamely tried to persuade a New London Architecture event on office development that the firm knows what it鈥檚 doing to 鈥渁ttract the best cultural and creative enterprises from neighbouring districts鈥. However, I鈥檓 not sure they quite understand Shoreditch鈥檚 inclusive melting pot vibe. Andrews told delegates the park at the east of the site would act as a 鈥渂uffer鈥 to keep 鈥渉oi polloi鈥 out of the quarter once finished.
Shard times
The View from the Shard experience 800ft up in western Europe鈥檚 tallest building is proving a fruitful source of stories for The Sun newspaper. Last year the tabloid gleefully speculated that the toilets there were being used by 鈥渞andy thrill-seekers鈥 to 鈥渆njoy sky-high romps鈥 after a pair of women鈥檚 knickers were found. Then this week it noted that more than 200 visitors were left stranded in the viewing gallery for more than an hour after the lifts stopped working during a fire scare. Unfortunately the impressive views were not enough to sustain interest for some visitors, one of whom said the scene was 鈥渟hambolic鈥. Still, not a bad place to be stuck for a while, providing you keep your head for heights.
Lost in translation
At 黑洞社区 towers we do sometimes end up looking into rather obscure news leads from overseas, but this week we received correspondence that left our journalists scratching their heads. An envelope with a postmark from Sweden arrived containing visualisations of a crane and a Post-it note saying simply: 鈥淚 found these pictures. Is Hiab [a Finland-based crane company] launching a new crane?鈥 How mysterious - we鈥檝e dispatched a reporter to Helsinki and will bring you the latest as soon as we have it.
Tilting at wind farms
Wind farms are controversial but who knew they were collaborating with our enemies? Citing an objection by the Ministry of Defence to two wind farm proposals in Cornwall because of the impact the turbines may have on air traffic control radar nearby, the Daily Telegraph suggests the wind farms would 鈥渁id the enemy鈥. Apparently, the paper reports, the Ministry of Defence says the 115ft towers are 鈥渟o big they could look like planes on monitoring equipment鈥, which in turn may lead to fighter jets being scrambled to attack the wind farms. And - the paper argues - false alarms like this would provide cover for 鈥渞eal enemies to sneak in鈥. Treachery!
No comments yet