Research by 黑洞社区 shows most councils will re-tender contracts with failed social housing firm

Morgan Sindall鈥檚 attempt to pick up more than half of Connaught鈥檚 contracts is faltering as law firms said most of its social housing clients have terminated the deals.

Just six out of the 52 housing associations and local authorities represented by law firms contacted by 黑洞社区 have switched their Connaught contracts to Lovell, Morgan Sindall鈥檚 social housing arm.

Thirty-nine have terminated their contracts, meaning they will have to re-enter the OJEU process if the deals are worth more than 拢156,000 a year for services, or 拢3.9m a year for works. Seven clients have either not decided what to do or have transferred some contracts to Lovell and terminated others.

The law firms contacted are Devonshires (which has eight clients), Trowers & Hamlins (26), Shoosmiths (two) and Anthony Collins (16). They said their clients were worried that if they switched the contracts to Lovell they could be open to legal challenges from rival contractors.

Andrew Vickery, a partner in Trowers & Hamlins, said housing associations will seek more suppliers to avoid a repeat of the Connaught collapse. 鈥淪ome will take the chance to restructure their contracts so they don鈥檛 put their eggs in one basket,鈥 he said.

The news conflicts with a Morgan Sindall statement to the City two weeks ago, which said it had bought 鈥渢he majority鈥 of Connaught鈥檚 contracts, as well as its physical assets and its
work-in-progress, for 拢28m (see Citywatch, below).

It said it would add 拢200m of revenue to the company鈥檚 books. Despite the uncertainty, a spokesperson for the company reiterated this week that it was still 鈥渃onfident that the majority of the contracts will come across and the company is happy with the 拢200m figure.鈥

Last week 黑洞社区 revealed that Morgan Sindall would still think the deal was worth it if half the contracts came across - as long as they were the better performing deals.