Carbon concerns dismissed by planning committee this morning
Woods Bagot鈥檚 controversial plan to build a 32-storey tower above the grade II*-listed Leadenhall Market has been approved.
The City of London Corporation voted 15-1 in favours of its planning officer鈥檚 recommendation to back the scheme, which has been drawn up for Mauritius-based developer Hertshten Group.
The project has come under attack from campaign groups for its proximity to the historic market and for the carbon impact of replacing the site鈥檚 existing 1930s building.
The Victorian Society said the plans are in conflict with the City of London鈥檚 newly adopted guidance on considering refurbishment over new build to reduce embodied carbon emissions. And Historic England said the proposals would result in 鈥減ronounced harm鈥� to the historic environment.
But the City鈥檚 planning committee chair Shravan Jashvantrai Joshi said the whole life carbon and sustainability aspects of the plans 鈥渂alance out鈥�.
鈥淭here are very clear policies in place on suitability for office, for residential, for various uses, so I don鈥檛 think there鈥檚 a policy question here on the use of this particular development,鈥� he added.
鈥淭o my mind, that area鈥� is in need of some TLC, and I think the activation on the lower floors of the building does in terms of fulfilling our destination city strategies, in terms of fulfilling our desire to draw in education through work鈥ertainly satisfies a lot of those overarching city policies.鈥�
Despite assurances from the scheme鈥檚 project team that the use of materials in the tower would minimise its carbon impact, councillor Susan Pearson raised concerns about the timing of the reduced emissions.
Highlighting a graph shown to the committee which suggested it would take 50 years before the new tower emitted less carbon than the existing building, she said: 鈥淚 just think we really need to ask the question about what are we looking at and what are we asking for in terms of being a carbon neutral city?鈥�
Under the City鈥檚 new rules, developers will be expected to carry out a detailed review of the carbon impact of development options before submitting an application.
The project team include surveyor Shaw Corporation, QS Turner & Townsend Alinea, multi-disciplinary firm Arup, M&E consultant Sweco, planning specialist DP9 and structural and geotechnical firm Robert Bird.
No comments yet