A must read news article on the zero carbon exemption debate
It鈥檚 really been a boom year for workload, though a real bust for energy and sustainability regulation. Watering down of Part L 2013 ambitions is disappointing and now behind us. My re-read of an article would be 鈥淢inister outlines limit for zero carbon exemption鈥� by Vern Pitt, not just because it鈥檚 a contribution to the zero carbon exemption debate but the buried reference to dropped plans to remove councils鈥� ability to set energy efficiency standards higher than building regulations before 2016 i.e. post-election. This last pillar of regulation, albeit at time miss placed in its application, fortunately looks like it has survived.
David Bownass is sustainability director at WSP
Minister outlines limit for zero carbon exemption
Small site exemption for zero carbons standard likely to apply to sites of less than 10 homes
A government minister has said that the exemption of 鈥渟mall sites鈥� from the zero carbon homes standard in 2016 is likely to apply to sites of less than 10 homes.
The government announced plans to exempt 鈥渟mall sites鈥� from the zero-carbon homes standard last month as a way of easing the pressure of regulation on smaller builders, who work mostly on small sites.
However, it did not say how small sites would need to be to qualify for the exemption, stating only that it would consult on it soon.
The Home Builders Federation said that sites of up to 50 homes would be 鈥渁 good starting point for the debate鈥� on where the exemption should kick in.
But green leaders fear that an exemption of sites this size would hobble the policy because it would lead to around a third of homes being made exempt from the zero carbon standard.
However, speaking in the House of Lords last week, Lord Ahmad, parliamentary under-secretary of state at the Department for Communities and Local Government, said the government favoured setting the threshold for a small site closer to ten units.
He said: 鈥淩egarding the site threshold, there has been much press speculation that it could be as high as 50 units.
鈥淗owever, for the recent consultation on section 106 agreements, the threshold was 10 units or fewer.
鈥淭his is likely to be nearer the figure that we consult on.鈥�
鈥淚n that respect, I cannot anticipate the government鈥檚 final position but I can say that we will be looking closely at the conclusions of the consultation on the section 106 proposals as we develop our thinking.鈥�
Ahmed also confirmed that the government has dropped plans to remove councils鈥� ability to set energy efficiency standards higher than building regulations between now and the introduction of zero carbon in 2016.
He said these restrictions of councils鈥� powers would only be introduced alongside the zero-carbon standard.
He said: 鈥淚t shows clearly that we are conscious of the need for a sensible transition arrangement.鈥�
No comments yet